Laserfiche WebLink
4.6 WATER RESOURCES <br /> Flooding Impacts <br /> Impact <br /> 4.6-4 All of the proposed homesites, and most of the access road,are within the 100-year <br /> floodplain and would be inundated during a 100-year flood. <br /> Flooding is a significant issue for the project since most of the site is within the 100 year flood plain of <br /> the Mokelumne River. There are two possible sources of flooding on the project site; Jahant Slough and <br /> the Mokelumne River. <br /> The proposed project will place 26 homesites within the 100-year floodplain. Nearly the entire site is <br /> �t ithin the 100-year floodplain. Depths of flooding during a 100-year event will vary with the elevations <br /> within the site. The 100-year flood velocities throughoutthe site will generally be less than one foot-per- <br /> second except in Jahant Slough or other large drainages. <br /> The large amount of floodplain storage in the Mokelumne River floodplain function to keep the flood <br /> Mages from substantially increasing by allowing the flood water to spread out into the floodplain in the <br /> form of shallow overbank flooding. The majority of the project site provides floodplain storage during <br /> the 100-year flood. Without this floodplain storage at the site, the flood elevations in the Mokelumne <br /> River would be higher. <br /> To evaluate the relative impact of the project site on the Mokelumne River floodplain,the EIR consultant <br /> used the National Weather Service dynamic wave hydraulic routing model, known as DWOPER <br /> (Dynamic Wave Operational Model). Unlike standard water surface profile models, DWOPER has the <br /> capability to account for the varying effects of floodplain storage. For the EIR analysis, a base <br /> conditions model was created by using cross-section data for the Mokelumne River floodplain provided <br /> by the Sacramento District Crops of Engineers. Following completion of the base conditions model, a <br /> post project conditions model was created by modifying the base conditions model. The modifications <br /> incorporated into the post project model included the elimination of about 100-acre-feet of floodplain <br /> storage from the Mokelumne River floodplain in the vicinity of the project site. The estimated loss of <br /> 100 acre-feet of floodplain storage due to the project was based on the estimated volume of fill at the <br /> project site along with the estimated management of the Tracy Lakes. A comparison of the results of <br /> both models indicates that the Mokelumne River floodplain is not very sensitive to the loss of this volume <br /> of flood storage. The difference in the 100-year water surface elevations computed by-the two models <br /> indicated an increase of 0.06 feet near the project site, diminishing to 0.00 about two to three miles away <br /> from the site. This significant impact can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. <br /> 4.6-19 <br />