SU0013451 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Sullivan Page 2 development is pro ted by the Williamson Act. (See, 62 Ops. Att'y Gen. 233 (1979) ; 54 ps. n.e0 (1971) . ) Both of these opinions dealt with proposed rural low density subdivisions, similar to what is proposed here. In one case, the Attorney General concluded as follows. Unless the single family residences proposed for each of the subdivided lots are incidental to the use of the lot for the purpose of producing agricultural commodities for commercial purposes, the division of a 1308 acre preserve into 29 lots of varying acreage from 20 to 185 acres would constitute a violation of the Williamson Act contract binding on that land. If the primary use of the land is not agricultural use, the construction of a single family home would, in our opinion, violate the contract. (62 Ops. Att'y Gen.d at 233 , 241, emphasis added. ) In the other instance, the Attorney General considered a proposed subdivision of Williamson Act lands into 20 acre "home sites. " What is proposed here does violence to the letter and spirit of the Williamson Act. If it were permitted, then there actually could be a conversion of approximately 2 square miles of farm land into a rural subdivision containing sixty homes, with no commercial agricultural enterprises. It is apparent that to give such parcels special treatment under Section 423 of the Revenue and Taxation Code would be inequitable to the county and the State in that each is deprived of the chief benefit of the contract, namely the preservation of agricultural land. (54 Ops. Att'y Gen. at 92 , emphasis added. ) In addition to the Attorney General 's specific conclusions, the courts have consistently recognized that the paramount purpose of the Williamson Act is "to conserve agricultural land and prevent conversion to urban uses" (Dorcich v. Johnson (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 487 , 489, emphasis added; see also; County of Orange v. Cory (1979) 97 Cal.App.3d 760; etc. ) The residential development proposed for Buckeye ranch is not compatible with the current contracted status of the land. Government Code Section 51220.5 includes the legislative finding that "agricultural operations are often hindered or impaired by uses which increase the density of the permanent or temporary human population of the agricultural area". Consistent with this finding, the Legislature requires that cities and counties shall determine the types of uses to be deemed compatible in a manner which recognizes these population impacts on agricultural lands. The NOP states that " (r)esidents will be subject to spray drift