SU0013451 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Sullivan Page 3 from the airborne application of various herbicides and fumigants from adjacent agricultural operations that may be toxic. " This is exactly the type of human population/agriculture conflict that Section 51220.5 was intended to prevent. This additionally indicates that the residential development is not compatible. The NOP states that the golf course may be proposed as being a compatible use on land enrolled in the Williamson Act. However, the primary purpose of the Williamson Act is to protect and enhance agricultural lands. To be successful, the golf course must increase the human population density of the area. This population is subject to the same conflict with nearby agriculture as are the residents, as noted above. Thus, the golf course fails the test of compatibility set forth in Government Code Section 51220.5. The Williamson Act does admit certain types of public recreation. Government Code Section 51202 (n) states that, " 'Recreational Use' is the use of land by the public, with or without charge, for any of the following: walking, hiking, picnicking, camping swimming, boating, fishing, hunting, or other outdoor games or sports for which facilities are provided for public participation. Any fee charged for the recreational use of land as defined in this subdivision shall be in a reasonable amount and shall not have the effect of unduly limiting its use by the public. " Page 3 of the NOP states that, "General public access is not contemplated. . . . " Since the development is proposed as private, gated community, it does not appear that the golf course would be available to the public and therefore could not be considered a compatible use. In addition, the NOP states that pesticides and herbicides used on the golf course, particularly gopher and mole poisons, may adversely effect wildlife within the adjoining nature preserve. This impact additionally indicates that the golf course is not compatible with adjoining open space uses on the contracted parcel. Assuming arguendo that either the residential development or the golf course are compatible, expansion of allowed uses on contract lands may cause taxes on all such lands to rise. This is because the taxation of Williamson Act parcels reflects the value of the land as restricted. If the restrictions are read to allow this type of development, then the local assessor may properly impute added commercial value to all similar contracted lands. Therefore, regardless of whether such use may technically be justified, allowing it may very well dilute tax preferences