My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013451
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LAKE FOREST
>
2248
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
WC-90-1
>
SU0013451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2021 4:00:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 11:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013451
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
WC-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
2248
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LAKE FOREST
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
00306001
ENTERED_DATE
6/17/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2248 W LAKE FOREST RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1834
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Agreemeat (for the treatment and disposition of human remains, associated burial goods, <br /> unassociat.�d burial goods, sacred objects and sacred sites] between the lead agency (SJCCDD), <br /> the developer, and the Tribe (see Appendix 1.3). <br /> Walloupe(1992), representing the Amador Tribal Council, informed the SJCCDD that the Tribal <br /> Council believes the "remains" at the Buckeye Ranch were left by ancestors of the Maximos <br /> family currently residing in Ione. The Tribal Council, commenting on the Draft report of <br /> Ananian and Rice (1991), found that the information presented was not sufficient for them to <br /> offer specific recommendations. They suggested the boundaries of the sites had not been <br /> established. They supported Johnson's (1992) proposal to conduct soil testing to identify the <br /> boundaries of each cultural deposit, and expressed their desire for the development of a <br /> reasonable and responsible plan for the management of the resources present (see Appendix 1.4). <br /> In light of these comments and their own critical review, the SJCCDD concluded that additional <br /> field work was needed (SJCCDD 1992). They required additional survey of specific project <br /> locations to ensure that no prehistoric sites were missed and that previously recorded sites be <br /> rerecorded to State Historic Preservation Office standards. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.