Laserfiche WebLink
area was constructed to prevent flooding from the Mokelumne River. <br /> Examination of topographic maps indicate that overflow between the <br /> lake and the river would naturally have occurred at about elevation <br /> +25 feet along the western edge of the property where there is lower <br /> ground along the river , however , construction of the levee along this <br /> western boundary of the property now prevents that from happening . <br /> The large storm that occurred February 12-19 , 1986 produced enough <br /> runoff in Jahant Slough to completely fill the lakes to approximately <br /> elevation + 26 feet . Examination of aerial photographs taken on <br /> February 22 , 1986 indicate that the lake and the river were at <br /> approximately the same elevation and that the levee that runs along <br /> the western edge of the property prevented the lake and the river <br /> from joining at that point . The river was then flowing at <br /> approximately 5, 000 cubic feet per second as measured at the <br /> Woodbridge gauging station which is maintained by the U.S .G. S . <br /> Comparison of this flow rate with Peak Rain and Snow melt Flood <br /> Frequency Curves prepared by the Army Corps of Engineers for Camanche <br /> Reservoir, which regulates the flow downstream in the Mokelumne <br /> River, indicate that this flow rate corresponds to about a 50 year <br /> flood release . Furthermore , these same curves indicate that if the <br /> flow were unregulated by any dams that this flow rate would <br /> correspond to a flood event with about a 2 year return frequency. <br /> These curves are presented in Figures 2 and 3 . <br /> The U.S .G. S . has maintained the Woodbridge gauging station since <br /> 1926 . The first major dam on the Mokelumne River was Pardee Dam <br /> which was completed in 1930. Figures 4 and 5 show plots of the <br /> Annual Peak Discharge and Annual Peak Stage respectively for the <br /> period 1926 through 1987 for this gauging station. Also shown for <br /> comparison are the completion years of the various dams and the <br /> estimated discharge rate or stage resulting from a uncontrolled 2 <br /> year return frequency flood. These plots give some idea as to the <br /> reduction in flooding that has occurred since the various dams have <br /> been built on the Mokelumne. Even allowing for normal variation in <br /> precipitation there seems to be a definite reduction in the frequency <br /> of peak flow release equaling or exceeding the uncontrolled 2 year <br /> flood event. Of course flood control was one of the reasons that the <br /> dams were built in the first place. <br /> There is no recorded runoff information for Jahant Slough, however, <br /> Angelo Brovelli said that it would normally require about 20 inches <br /> of rainfall per year for Jahant Slough to fill the lakes . This is <br /> about 25% greater than the average annual rainfall for the area which <br /> is about 16 inches per year. He said that even after the Mokelumne <br /> was dammed and the levees were built that the lakes would pretty much <br /> have water in them all the time just from runoff from Jahant Slough. <br /> Recently, however, there hasn ' t been any water in them since the <br /> drought began in 1987, with rainfall averaging about 12 inches for <br /> the last couple of years. It is also likely that there was <br /> significantly more runoff from Jahant Slough before the watershed was <br /> modified for agriculture and crisscrossed with roads and railroads <br /> which impede runoff . <br /> Figure 6 shows the stage vs. storage relationship for both lakes <br /> combined. Also shown for comparison are estimates of the amount of <br /> 2 <br />