My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013451
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LAKE FOREST
>
2248
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
WC-90-1
>
SU0013451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2021 4:00:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 11:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013451
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
WC-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
2248
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LAKE FOREST
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
00306001
ENTERED_DATE
6/17/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2248 W LAKE FOREST RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1834
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
effects of flooding on the health or regeneration of the forest. <br /> The first problem can be solved expensively, by additional surveying, or less expensively <br /> by conducting a trial flood (Zuckerman, personal communication, 1990). The second <br /> problem, although not immediately crucial, must be better understood within the next ten <br /> years. Without knowing the demography of the forest trees, managers will be unable to <br /> evaluate the success of management activities. An analogy might be helpful. If our goal <br /> were to maintain a healthy deer herd, the manager would need to know the size of the herd, <br /> the ratio of males to females, approximate ages of the population and birth rates and <br /> hunting success. The manager uses this information to set the annual hunting limit and to <br /> properly manage the herd. Although deer are quite different than oaks, similar information <br /> is necessary to properly manage the forest. Currently we know the extent, approximate <br /> numbers, and even have a rough estimate of reproduction. However, since we know <br /> neither the ages or the mortality rates, we cannot determine if there are enough trees,or the <br /> effects of our management decisions. <br /> Option 3 involves developing appropriate regeneration and management techniques based <br /> on site field trials. Although this option is time consuming, it is not costly and should <br /> generate valuable information.We think that waiting to implement a management plan until <br /> after a 3 to 5 year trial period would not have an adverse affect on the health of the forest. <br /> Option 4 involves complete management of the forest. This option is not necessary, nor <br /> philosophically or economically attractive. The expense involved in marking, mapping and <br /> managing the forest would far exceed the costs of the other options. In addition we believe <br /> that the forest ecosystem retains some natural capacity for self-regeneration. <br /> After consultation with Bob Belt, from Kjeldsen-Sinnock, and Toby Hanes, the <br /> hydrologist from Hydroscience, we developed the following assumptions and <br /> Buckeye Ranch Resource Plan (November, 1993) <br /> 170 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.