Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Kerry Sullivan <br /> April 8, 1992 <br /> Page 23 <br /> Page 6 - 2 Cultural Resources <br /> Damage to the surface archaeological remains of the Tracy Lakes complex has already taken <br /> place due to the clearing and grading for the proposed roads and golf course. At this stage of <br /> planning, the no project alternative is the only acceptable alternative for these highly significant C239 <br /> sites providing the property continues to be used for grazing purposes. Leveling of the land for <br /> agricultural purposes would destroy most of the significant cultural resources. Due to the <br /> significance of these resources, it is unlikely the land could be substantially altered without <br /> proper mitigation. <br /> Dave Fisher,an owner of the property, and Jaime Nunez,superintendent,have presented declarations to <br /> San Joaquin County stating they found no archaeological remains during their removal or subsequent <br /> dirt managementthat was necessary to fill the stump holes. Damage to the archeological sites has been <br /> caused by various archaeologists over the years who have excavated the sites. <br /> Page 6 - 3 Land Use/Planning Policy <br /> The proposed golf course design intrudes on the existing riparian area, reducing its value as a <br /> habitat. Elimination of the course would preserve habitat and improve compatibility between on- C240 <br /> site land uses. <br /> The Environmental Impact Report author clearly does not understand the valuable habitat an <br /> environmentallysensitive golf course can create. <br /> Paae 6 - 3 Geoloav <br /> This alternative would reduce the soil-related impacts in two significant ways. First, with respect <br /> to wastewater disposal,the concern about inspections, maintenance,construction and repair of C241 <br /> leachfield systems would be reduced, since the systems would presumably be located in <br /> relatively accessible open space areas, rather than in golf course fairways. The need for dual <br /> systems and construction all leachfield systems at the start of developmentwould be reduced or <br /> eliminated. Second, with respect to erosion, the elimination of the golf course would reduce <br /> grading needs and the consequent soil erosion,dust generation and soil compaction concerns. <br /> It appears the Environmental Impact Report author is making the issue of the septic systems a bigger I <br /> issue that it needs to be. The concept of Planned development promotes flexibility in design. <br /> The elimination of the golf course would necessitate the need to introduce more cattle to the property <br /> increasing the likelihood of the creation of a dustbowl. <br /> Page 6 - 4 Water Resources <br /> 1 <br /> The elimination of the golf course would substantially reduce the water demand. Water trapped <br /> for storage from Jahant Slough would be adequate to meet the demands of the project except <br /> during the most severe droughts. Since surface water impoundments would meet the project <br /> demands, the need for make-up water from groundwater pumping or summer diversions from C242 <br /> the Mokelumne River would be eliminated,reducing impacts on these resources. Impacts to the <br /> flood storage and flood dynamics would be similar to those discussed above for the proposed <br /> project. The project would still create building pads, roads, canals and lakes that affect the <br /> floodplain storage and flood elevation on the site. Nitrate loading to groundwater would be <br /> reduced by about 20 percent in comparison with the proposed project. Erosion hazards <br /> III-138 <br />