Laserfiche WebLink
B. San Joaquin County Department of Agencies <br /> Bl: Comment acknowledged. The attainment status of the County and requirements of the California <br /> Clean Air Act are discussed on page 4.5-4 of the DEIR. <br /> 132: The project would not be subject to the currently proposed Indirect Source Review Rule, but <br /> would be subject to the PM-10 Fugitive Dust Rule as it is currently written. Mitigation Measure <br /> 4.5-1(b)on page 4.5-8 requires the preparation of a PM-10 Dust Prevention and Control Plan to <br /> be submitted to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, which is what <br /> would be required under the draft PM-10 Fugitive Dust Rule. <br /> 133: The PM-10 Dust Prevention and Control Plan described in Mitigation Measure 4.5-1(b)addresses <br /> the types of dust measures that could be used at a project of this type. The district's list of <br /> suggested mitigation measures was reviewed in preparing this mitigation requirement, and <br /> measures deemed appropriate for a project of this type were included in the DEIR. <br /> 134: Comment acknowledged. No further response is required. <br /> 135: The use of EPA-certified woodstoves in residences is discussed in Mitigation Measure 4.5-2, <br /> page 4.5-10 of the DEIR. <br /> 136: Comment acknowledged. The project as currently proposed would contain no new commercial <br /> or industrial sources that would require permits from the District. <br /> 137-9: Comments acknowledged. No further response is required. <br /> 1310: The list of proposed new regulations and programs represents the District's commitment to adopt <br /> new rules in the future. Whether or not theses rules would apply to the proposed project would <br /> depend on when these rules are adopted and when the project is built. Of the sources listed, <br /> those that could affect the proposed project include asphalt application,residential space heaters, <br /> residential water heaters and residential woodburning. <br /> B 11: Comment noted. No further response is required. <br /> B 12: The comment indicating the need for the traffic study to determine the impacts upon County <br /> roadways during construction is hereby noted. Readers are referred to Mitigation Measure 4.2-3 <br /> on page 4.2-19 of the DEIR which recommends a study to determine the roadway improvements <br /> needed be completed before final map approval. <br /> B13: The EIR has been revised to reflect the concerns of the Public Works Department. Refer to <br /> Volume II, Section 4.2. <br /> B 14: Language has been added to Impact 4.8-6 and a new mitigation measure has been added calling <br /> for a waste generation analysis to be provided by the applicant. <br /> B 15: According to the project site plan submitted by the project applicant,the proposed parking areas <br /> along the collector road for vehicles during golf tournaments would be set back some distance <br /> from the actual travel lanes of the roadway, and therefore should not affect the required travel <br /> lane space. According to the standards adopted by the County,primary collector roads must be <br /> 1I1-163 <br />