SU0013451 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C58: A clear span bridge across the river should have minimal effects on sediment deposition and fish entrapment on the Mokelumne River. The EIR does not find this to be a significant impact. C59: This is a statement of opinion. It is the belief of County Counsel that public access does not need to be provided as discussed in the Draft EIR. This decision will be made by the Board of Supervisors. C60: Opinion noted. C61: The cumulative demand for gas and electricity is included in Section 5.3. C62: This information is noted. C63: Information noted. The developer and/or builder must coordinate building plans with PG&E to provide energy efficient features in new homes. This will be a condition of final map approval. C64: All professional statements were referenced in the professional literature. C65: Commenter should refer to the technical report, as the site records for all eight sites are in the confidential appendix of that report. These site records include location maps. C66: Site CA-SJO-42 was not included in our discussion because it is located outside the project site and does not extend onto the property. Former sites CA-SJO44 and -45 may be outside of the project area, but they constitute part of the larger site, now CA-SJO-43. C57: The confusion which has been raised by the commenter can be clarified with a review of the official, legal UTM and site numbers on file at the Central California Information Center at Stanislaus State. The commenter does not clarify if he is discussing site CA-SJO-43 or CA-SJO-44. C68: Figure 4.9-2 in the DEIR indicates that this site extends off of the property and its extent off the property is unknown. Much of this report is an update of the work performed by Dawson, an amateur archaeologist who excavated in the area in the 1920s. C69: On April 4, 1992, the Central California Information Center at Stanislaus State University reviewed, accepted and assigned permanent trinomial numbers for every site record submitted by the DEIR archaeologists. C70: This is a statement of opinion and does not warrant further response. C71: Assigning separate entities to these sites was the result of faulty early field work. Specific use areas (loci) within a site will be determined with a Phase 11 investigation. C72: This project is not constrained by the work of an amateur performed over 70 years ago. C73: Midden deposits are not shown on public documents, but are reproduced in the confidential report. Don McGeein's field records are reproduced in Attachment C of the Phase I technical report. A Phase 11 study would produce a comprehensive map of all resources uncovered to date, as suggested on page 4.9-12 of the DEIR. 111-169