Laserfiche WebLink
CLOsuRg DOCUMENT A,�,LICATION VMS I 1 nr� 1�► �I�, � <br /> t. 4E& Distmce to action wells for municipal- <br /> 20M feet or the site; Pv� dotttcstJc�agriculture.Industry��uses <br /> • Z. S" <br /> Psf to scale,of area impacted :bowing location:of former and extstin <br /> excMdon contours and sample locations, bor=n 8 tank systems, <br /> gradreats, andnearby surfaoa water buildjn 8 and monitoring well elevation contours. <br /> y gs, streets, and subsurface u ' . <br /> 3. Figure=de icon Wain ' . <br /> `L P 8 Sy (cross section), treatment system diagrams <br /> 4. +U Story W soil remaining on•sita or Off-site disposal (quandtyr ;„""c�"o d`+tet 4 �9•go <br /> S. #� Monitoring wens Mainingron•site, tato; P*XP M. <br /> 6. Ltr,—S Tabulated data of all ground water elevation$ and depths to water; _ �{.(,'}a <br /> 7. 14a Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: <br /> Detection limits for confirmation sampling <br /> ,2 Lead analyses <br /> g• (� Concentration contours of contaminants found and thou remaining roil <br /> on- and off-site: ground water, both <br /> Lateral extent of soil contamination zi , <br /> Vertical extent of soil contamination <br /> Lateral extent of ground water contamination <br /> Vertical extent of ground watet contamination <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for <br /> zone of capture attained for the soil and the subsurface remediation system and the <br /> ground water remediation system; <br /> 10. ✓ ReporWinformadoo <br /> Unauthorized Release Form (URF) <br /> Z AR � , wp* o 4�qs m; 9/93) 1 /q4 <br /> —1k FRP <br /> I <br /> 4EL <br /> Well and bor=ner (report , q�4 i T� I/ 31 Soc r <br /> 8 lois wa+ti pia 9ix ►m ��� �k� <br /> 11. Best Available Technology (BAT) used or an explanation for not using BAT; <br /> 12. - s w <br /> Reasonhy "background" was/is unattainable using BAT; <br /> 13.Ij <br /> f 5 Mass balance calculation of the substance treated versus that remaining;'o o ill �`"� ala SL <br /> 14. 4 Assumptions. pazameters, calculations and model used in risk assessments,.aDnd fate and tram rpt <br /> modeling; Po <br /> 13. F`�' Rationale why conditions remaining at the site will not adversely impact water quality, health, or <br /> other beneficial uses; and <br /> 16. #-1— WET or'PCLP results <br /> Comments: <br /> E8r' -�— <br /> Da c <br />