My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012663
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
1100
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507217
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012663
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 4:53:26 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 2:20:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012663
RECORD_ID
PR0507217
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007741
FACILITY_NAME
AUTO ZONE INC
STREET_NUMBER
1100
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
11733035
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1100 N WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
460
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
»WgE <br /> r <br /> DATA MDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING <br /> Data travels through several processes before the final data <br /> package is released to the client. The path from the <br /> instrument response to the final report begins with the <br /> documentation of all testing parameters in the analyst's <br /> notebook. All calculations for the sample as well as the <br /> quality control measurements are also documented in the <br /> notebook. once the analyst is satisfied that the analytical <br /> batch meets all quality control requirements and has <br /> quantitated the sample, the result is transferred to a set of <br /> laboratory worksheets specific to the client's requests on <br /> the chain of custody. When completed the worksheets are <br /> submitted to the project manager for review. <br /> The project manager reviews the results, and checks that the <br /> analyses performed are appropriate to the client's requests. <br /> Related analyses from the same sample are compared for <br /> coherence, and the data is compared with previous results <br /> from the same source to observe any deviations from <br /> established trends. Unusually high results, or those clearly <br /> in violation of discharge limits or hazardous waste <br /> standards, are reviewed carefully for any reporting unit <br /> errors and frequently trigger an examination of the analyst's <br /> notebook and instrument printouts to check for calculation <br /> errors. Final review often involves further consultation <br /> with clients. After typing, the report is again reviewed by <br /> the project manager to ensure accurate transfer of <br /> - information from the laboratory worksheets to the final <br /> report. <br /> The laboratory director is responsible for the final review <br /> of the report, to which he adds his signature. Copies of <br /> -- final reports are kept in a secure filing area for a minimum <br /> of ten years and include the original laboratory worksheets <br /> and the chain of custody. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.