My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002-2015
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CLAY
>
655
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231065
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2022 2:10:00 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:40:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002-2015
RECORD_ID
PR0231065
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003699
FACILITY_NAME
DSS COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
655
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CLAY
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14707110
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
655 W CLAY ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231065_655 W CLAY_2002-2015.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
484
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�❑ lv� � fc o� <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: 417.02 <br />Com lete the foliowin checkiiat <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational?' <br />® Yes <br />❑ No` <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their proper <br />operation? <br />Yes <br />❑ No* '' <br />walarms are relayed to a remotemonitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modem) operational? <br />�Z ;Yes <br />,0 No c ,.: <br />For<pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, <br />. ❑ ,N/A <br />fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors' initiate positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ® Sumpfrrench <br />Sensors; Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />„ n ns <br />i,:YMi <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks A_rLq sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes; ❑ No. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no mechanical overfill prevention valve is <br />® N/A <br />installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity <br />does the alarm trigger? 0%- - <br />❑ <br />® No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes or other equipment replaced' and list the manufacturer name <br />and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />Yes <br />❑ ` ` <br />No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br />❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />Yes <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers specifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />qt_ € C <br />E. Cornna . <br />ments: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.