My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1987-1998
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
430
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231425
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1987-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2022 1:58:10 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:47:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1987-1998
RECORD_ID
PR0231425
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003838
FACILITY_NAME
Frontier California Inc.: Manteca CO
STREET_NUMBER
430
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
St
City
Manteca
Zip
95336
APN
217-021-04
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
430 W Center St
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231425_430 W CENTER_1987-1998.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
387
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Criterion for Declaring a Leak <br />3. This system <br />(X) uses a preset threshold <br />( ) measures and reports the output quantity and compares it to a predetermined threshold <br />to determine whether the pipeline is leaking. <br />4. This system <br />(X) uses a single test <br />uses a multiple -test sequence consisting of tests (specify number of tests <br />required) separated by hours (specify the time interval between tests) <br />to determine whether the pipeline is leaking. <br />5. This system declares a leak if the output of the measurement system exceeds a threshold of <br />OZ (specify flow rate in gal/h) in 1 out of 1 tests (specify, for example, I <br />Lsp <br />out of 2, 2 out of 3). If more detail is requiTe—d, please —specify in the space provided, <br />Evaluation Approach <br />6. There are five options for collecting the data used in evaluating the performance of this <br />system. This system was evaluated <br />at a special test facility (Option 1) <br />O at one or more instrumented operational storage tank facilities (Option 2) <br />O at five or more operational storage tank facilities verified to be tight (Option 3) <br />O at 10 or more operational storage tank facilities (Option 4) <br />O with an experimentally validated computer simulation (Option 5) <br />7. A total of _�_�3 . tests were conducted on nonlealdng tank(s) between jjMM (D -M- <br />and 22/OZ/ <br />,Y) _92 _ (D -M -Y). A description of the pipeline configuration used in the <br />evaluation is summarized in Attachment 3. <br />•I a <br />8. The pipeline used in the evaluation was 2 „in. in diameter, 112 ft long and <br />constructed of fiberglass (fiberglass, steel, or other). <br />9. A mechanical line leak detector <br />( )was <br />(X) was not <br />present in the pipeline system. <br />Answer questions 10 and 11 if Option 3 or 4 was used. <br />10. The evaluation was conducted on (how many) pipeline systems ranging in <br />diameter from in. to in., ranging in length from _ ft to _ ft, <br />and constructed of _ (specify materials). <br />Pipeline Leak Detcction System - Results Form Page 2 of S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.