My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1987-1998
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
430
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231425
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1987-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2022 1:58:10 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:47:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1987-1998
RECORD_ID
PR0231425
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003838
FACILITY_NAME
Frontier California Inc.: Manteca CO
STREET_NUMBER
430
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
St
City
Manteca
Zip
95336
APN
217-021-04
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
430 W Center St
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231425_430 W CENTER_1987-1998.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
387
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11. A mechanical line leak detector <br />( ) was <br />(X) was' not <br />present in the majority of the pipeline systems used in the evaluation. <br />12. Please specify how much time elapsed between the delivery of product and the start of the <br />data collection: <br />M 0 to 6 h (time after completition of circulation and start of test) <br />( )6to12h <br />( ) 12 to24h <br />( ) 24 h or more <br />Temperature Conditions <br />This system was evaluated under the range of temperature conditions specified in Table <br />1. The difference between the temperature of the product circulated through the pipeline for 1 h <br />or more and the average temperature of the backfill and soil between 2 and 12 in. from the <br />pipeline is summarized in Table 1. If Option 1, 2 or 5 was used, a more detailed summary of <br />the product temperature conditions generated for the evaluation is presented in Attachment 4. If <br />Option 3 or 4 was used, no artificial temperature conditions were generated. <br />Table 1. Summary of Temperature Conditions Used in the Evaluation <br />Minimum Number of <br />Conditions Required <br />Number of Conditions Used' <br />Range of ®T('F)" <br />1 <br />2 <br />AT < -25 <br />4 <br />8 <br />-25 < AT < -15 <br />5 <br />10 <br />-15 < 4T < -5 <br />5 <br />13 <br />-5<AT<+5 <br />5 <br />10 <br />+5<®T<+15 <br />4 <br />8 <br />+15 < AT < +25 <br />1 <br />2 <br />AT' 25 <br />"This column should be filled out only if Option 1, 2, or 5 was used. <br />®T is the difference between, the temperature of the product dispensed through the pipeline for over an hour prior <br />to the conduct of a test and the average temperature of the backfill and soil surrounding the pipe. <br />Data Used to Make Performance Estimates <br />13. The induced leak rate and the test results used to estimate the performance of this system <br />are summarized in Attachment S. Were any test runs removed from the data set? <br />( ) no <br />N yes <br />If yes, please specify the reason and include with Attachment S. (If more than one test was <br />removed, specify each reason separately.) <br />Pipeline Leak detection System - Results Form Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.