Laserfiche WebLink
`SWRCB, January 2002 <br />0 <br />C <br />S. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Test Method Uses: ❑Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS SUMP TESTING SYSTEM Equipment Resolution: 0.001 in. <br />Fill Sump # 1 Fill Sump 0 Fill Sump # Fill Sump # <br />Sump Diameter: 36" <br />Sump Depth: 45" <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration 16" <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: 17" <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: GOOD <br />Portion of Sump Tested 19" <br />Sump Material: FIBERGLASS <br />Wait time between= <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: 30 MIN. <br />Test Start Time: 12:23 PM/12:54 PM <br />Initial Reading (R): 4.8434"/4.8425" <br />Test End Time. 12:38 PM/1:09 PM <br />Final Reading (Rf): 4.8440"/4.8419" <br />Test Duration: 2X15 MIN. <br />Change in Reading (Rf-Rj): -0.0006" <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 0.002" <br />Test Result: PASS <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? YES <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? YES <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />YES <br />Was sensor properly replaced an <br />verified functional after testing? YES <br />Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />Revision: <br />