Laserfiche WebLink
Revision: <br />SWRCB, January 2002 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />8. FILL RISER CONTAUNMENT SUMP <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested 13 <br />Test Method Developed By: <br />Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard [3Professional Engineer <br />®Other (Specii t) <br />Test Method Uses: <br />®Pressure O Vacuum ® Hydrostatic <br />Other (Sped) <br />Test Equipment Used: Incon TS STS Equipment Resolution: 0.001" <br />Fill Sam # 1 Fin Sump # Fill Surn # F111 Sum # <br />Sump Diameter: <br />36" <br />Sump Depth: <br />45" <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />16" <br />Highest PiRing Penetration: <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />1711 <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />mvE <br />testing: <br />good <br />Portion of Sum Tested <br />19" <br />Sump Material: <br />fiberglass <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />30 min. ENVIRONM <br />. TAL HEALTH <br />startin test: <br />Test Start Time: <br />12:16 m/12:34 2mDEEE <br />Initial Reading (RI): <br />4.269111/4.2677" <br />Test End Time: <br />12:31 m/12:49 em <br />Final R*in (RF): <br />4.268411/4.2674" <br />Test Duration: <br />2x15 min. <br />Chane in Reading R <br />-0.0003" <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />0.002" <br />ves <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />yes <br />detected? <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />yes <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? <br />yes <br />Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />sensor was properly repositioned but not tested at this time. <br />Revision: <br />