COMPLIANCE INFO_2012-2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zach, CA478419 / Manteca CO was written up for the following: 104. Financial responsibility documents have not been submitted to the EHD. Current financial responsibility documents are required to be submitted annually. A copy of current financial responsibility documents was provided to the EHD at the time of inspection. CORRECTED ONSITE. 302 & 308. The test boots were not pulled back and Schrader valves were not removed in the fill sump and in the transition sump. Any potential release from the primary containment into the secondary containment in the diesel piping does not flow into a collection sump. All secondary containment systems shall be sloped so that all releases will flow to a collection sump located at the low point of the underground piping. During the inspection the technician removed the Schrader valve in the transition sump and pulled back the boot and removed the Schrader valve on the fill sump piping. CORRECTED ONSITE. 109. Annual monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing was performed on August 24, 2012 and a test report has not been submitted to the EHD within 30 days of testing. A copy of the test report must be submitted within 30 days of the tests. Ensure that future reports are submitted to the EHD within the required time frame. — Corrected - San Joaquin County Environmental Health had just moved when the 2012 report was mailed September 20, 2012. The correct address has been updated in our system. 204. The designated operator failed to check and note the correct test dates for the monitoring system certification and secondary containment testing on the following designated operator monthly inspection reports: September 2012, October 2012, November 2012, and December 2012. Furthermore, the November 2012 designated operator inspection report listed the inspection date as 11-0-2012. During the monthly inspection, the designated operator shall check that all required testing and maintenance for the UST system have been completed and document the dates they were done. Ensure that designated operators performing future monthly inspections at this facility are including all of the required information on the reports. It appears that the DO out the incorrect date for the monitoring system certification for the September 2012 report. The DO perpetuated the mistake for October 2012, November 2012 and December 2012 by noting the monitoring system certification date on the September 2012 DO report and failed to look at the actual monitoring system certification date. — This matter will be discussed at length with staff! Note: A copy of Owner Statement of Designated UST Operator form featuring updated ICC expiration dates was provided to the EHD at the time of inspection. Thank you, Michael Barber General Manager