My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1985-2006
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
2551
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231659
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1985-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 1:37:54 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:50:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1985-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231659
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003849
FACILITY_NAME
Verizon Business: MANTECA
STREET_NUMBER
2551
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
19801005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2551 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231659_2551 E LOUISE_1985-2006.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
477
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing(Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />Cmmnlete_ the MllnwinLy checklist: <br />Yes <br />®No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? - <br />ERI Yes <br />O No* <br />Is the visual alarm o rational? ' <br />Yes <br />O No* <br />Were all sensors visually ins ted functionally tested and canfirmed o rational? <br />ZYes <br />O No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their RroEr o ration? <br />Ok Yes <br />O No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote, monitoring station, is .all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />O N/A <br />operational? <br />O Yes <br />O No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shutdown if the piping secondary containment <br />CK N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) O Sump/Trench Sensors; O Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did X2u conium sitive shut -down due to leaks NW sensor failure/disconnection? O Yes; Cl No. <br />AL Yes <br />O No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the .monitoring -system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />O N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill point(s) ancT-o2Sratin& properly? If so, at what rcent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br />O Yes* <br />(W No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and M el for all re laeement arts in Section E, .below. <br />O Yes* <br />J51 No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) O <br />Product; O Water. If describe causes -in Section E, below. <br />P Yes <br />O No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper -settings? Attach -set up reports, if ap licable <br />IS Yes <br />O No* <br />Is all monitoring ui ment b rational M manufacturer's s ifieations? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these detletenetes were or wsie ve c®srct;vuU. <br />Page 2 of 3 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.