My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2008
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
907
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231871
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 3:51:51 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1998-2008
RECORD_ID
PR0231871
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003968
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T California - UE046
STREET_NUMBER
907
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95207
APN
077-470-07
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
907 W Lincoln Rd
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231871_907 W LINCOLN_1998-2008.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certification <br />Site Address: 907 LINCOLN ROAD, STOCKTON <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: 121.00 <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />Date of Testing/Servicing: 8/17/405 <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors visually ins ected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their proper operation? <br />FS --yes <br />❑ No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br />❑ N/A <br />operational? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />® N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑ No. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />® N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill point(s) and o eratin ro erl ? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br />❑ Yes* <br />® No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all r22lacement 2arts in Section E, below. <br />❑ Yes* <br />® No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br />❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? <br />® Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is all monitoring equi mentoperational ger manufacturer's s ecifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />Insert VR Probe Number as a check box for each tank under section B <br />DROP TUBE OVERFILL VALVE PRESENT <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.