COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 1 of 2 0 0 Jeff Wong [EH] From: Diane Lopez [dlopez@franzenhill.com] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 7:09 AM To: Jeff Wong [EH] Cc: Richard Warren Subject: RE: 2512 Waterloo EVR upgrade permit status Jeff - We are in the process of getting you the details requested. Diane Lopez Franzen -Hill Corporation 1100 N. "J" St. Tulare, CA 93274 (559) 688-2977 ext. 3002 (559) 805-3368 cell (559) 688-1467 fax From: Jeff Wong [EH] [mailto:Jwong@sjcehd.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 4:30 PM To: Diane Lopez Cc: Richard Warren Subject: RE: 2512 Waterloo EVR upgrade permit status Diane and Richard: Thanks for the revised plans for the service request (SR0057217). Our office (EHD) received it on May 13, 2010. 1 left a message on your (Diane's) voice mail the next day on May 14, 2010 that EHD still has questions before we can approve this Service Request. Since I have not heard back from you, I thought I would send you an email. In order for EHD to approve this workplan, please provide the following information: --Please clarify what is the "pipe" penetrating the sump (but NOT connected to the tank) drawn on Sheet 1? Is this "pipe" the old vent line, or new line, or some secondary conduit where the old and/or new vent lines are pulled through to be connected to the tank? Please label. -- EHD had asked for the "fate of the existing vent lines to the vent" in two previous email correspondences dated April 6 and May 5. 2010. The workplan stated that "existing vent lines to remain connected". Does that mean the existing vent line is still connected to the exsting vent column but is cut off /capped off inside the sump, or is it cutoff outside the sump? Please provide drawing of the existing vent and where it is cut off from the tank. -- EHD had asked for depth of the penetration into the 91 sump. Is the above -referenced "pipe" drawn on the workplan where the new vent line penetrates into the sump? If this "pipe" drawn on the workplan has nothing to do with the new vent line, how is the new vent line connected to the tank? Are there new penetrations into the sump for this EVR upgrade? Please draw and label how the new vent line is connected to the tank. -- This work plan still has not included location of the existing fuel lines requested by EHD in the above two previous emails. If this information is unknown, then secondary containment test for all fuel lines will be required. Please submit the above information as soon as possible. At this point it would appear that at minimum, a secondary containment test for the tank is required. Based on further information from you, a lake test for the sump and secondary containment test for the fuel lines may also be required. Sincerely, Jeff 5/20/2010