COMPLIANCE INFO_2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

External Events Analysis PHA Lead By: Peter Thomas,P.E.,Resource Compliance SSHP Cold Storage Date: 6/16/2020 Ammonia Refrigeration System Potential to The Expected Date of Monitoring DetectionType of Create a Completion of any Changes Major Hazards Process Mitigation and External Magnitude or Scope of External Events Which Were Considered Release? Resulting From the Most Identified Controls in Systems in Systems in Since the Event (Yes/No) Recent Hazard Review or Use Use Use Last PHA PHA 2745.6(1)(1) 2745.6(1)(2) 2745.6(1)(3) 2745.6(e)(1) 2745.6(e)(2) 2745.6(e)(3) 2745.6(e)(4) 2745.6(e)(5) 2745.6(e)(6) 2745.7(q)(1) 2745.7(q)(2) 2745.7(q)(3) 2745.7(e)(1) 2745.7(e)(2) 2745.7(e)(3) 2745.7(e)(4) 2745.7(e)(5) 2745.7(e)(6) Is equipment adequately protected to prevent a Yes-Visual inspection reveals that the hazardous materials release due to building building/equipment is in good structural Yes N/A damage as a result of seismic activity? condition. Is equipment adequately protected to prevent a Yes-Select areas of deficient pipe supports hazardous materials release due to piping are summarized in the Seismic Assessment Yes N/A support failure as a result of seismic activity? Report. Y Are personnel adequately protected to prevent No-Emergency Response/Action Plan Is in the Automatic Shut- Process Area m process of being updated.Ensure that the plan Toxic Release, Offs,Manual Detector in 6 injury from a hazardous materials release as a No 12/31/2020 r result of seismic activity? is updated,employees are training,and Equipment Shut-Offs, None Sheltered None coordination with first responders is conducted. Failure Check Valves, Machinery Lu Relief Valves Area Are personnel adequately protected to prevent No-Refer to comment above. No N/A injury from seismic activity? Have the results of all seismic analyses been Yes-The Initial Seismic Assessment was documented to support the above answers? performed by Peter Thomas,P.E.See report N/A N/A dated 6/3/20. Unknown-The original facility plans are not Which edition of the building code was used available.'Design codes and standards N/A 8/13/2015 when the process was designed? employed"documentation was developed with other process safety information. Is equipment adequately protected from damage Yes-Visual inspection reveals that the due to movement of process equipment as a building/equipment is in good structural Yes N/A result of high winds? condition. Is equipment adequately protected from damage Yes-The likelihood of wind-borne debris y from impact of wind-borne debris? impacting the system is low.High winds are Yes N/A Automatic Shut- Process Area a unlikely in this region. c Toxic Release, Offs,Manual Detector in Is equipment adequately protected from Yes-Structures appear to be adequate.High Equipment Shut-Offs, None Sheltered None neighboring structures that might be damaged ,finds are unlikely in this region. Yes N/A Failure Check Valves, Machinery from high winds? Relief Valves Area Yes-Location of equipment does not require Are procedures in place to restrict elevated work outdoor elevated work.The only exception is No N/A when winds exceed 25 mph? the roof of the building,but work would be stopped during high winds. 1