Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Stewart Black - 3 - 28 February 2017 <br /> Outside of the influence of the Lesco site, arsenic and vanadium are also present in <br /> groundwater to the west. The July 2015 Technical Memorandum - Distribution of Dissolved <br /> Arsenic in Groundwater at Rough and Ready Island, West Complex, Rough and Ready Is- <br /> land, Port of Stockton (Arsenic Report) showed that 14 shallow monitoring wells on Rough <br /> and Ready Island, which lies across the San Joaquin River about 700 feet west of Lesco, <br /> contained at least 3 consecutive quarters of dissolved arsenic at an average concentration <br /> of 386 ug/L. Furthermore, the Arsenic Report showed that at least 6 monitoring wells had <br /> maximum arsenic detections above 600 ug/l. In a 16 March 2016 letter, Central Valley Wa- <br /> ter Board staff concurred that the arsenic data in the Arsenic Report appeared to be log- <br /> normally distributed and that the higher arsenic concentrations do not appear to be outliers. <br /> Because the Lesco site is near Rough and Ready Island and in the same geologic environ- <br /> ment, and arsenic was not known to be handled at the fertilizer facilities, Regional Board <br /> staff believe that the arsenic found at the Lesco site is naturally occurring. <br /> Figure 3 illustrates the distribution of average concentrations of dissolved arsenic at Rough <br /> and Ready Island and at the Port of Stockton. <br /> Dissolved vanadium was analyzed in 3 shallow monitoring wells at concentrations ranging <br /> up to 65 ug/L. Vanadium is also present in subsurface native soil at the Lesco facility at <br /> concentrations between 16 and 47 mg/kg. Vanadium also was not known to be handled at <br /> the fertilizer facilities, therefore these compounds are also believed to be naturally occurring <br /> and not attributed to historical operations. <br /> Pesticides <br /> Site-wide soil sampling conducted in 2005 and 2006 did not detect chlorinated herbicides or <br /> organophosphorus pesticides. However, two of 38 samples contained benzene hexachlo- <br /> ride, both of which were removed in the excavation. One sample that was not excavated <br /> contained 62 ug/kg dieldrin at two feet bgs, which exceeds the residential soil screening lev- <br /> el of 34 ug/kg, but is below the industrial screening level of 140 ug/kg (June 2015 USEPA <br /> Regional Screening Levels). DDE and DDT were found in this sample at 103 and <br /> 117 ug/kg, respectively, which are below residential screening levels of 2,000 and 1,900 <br /> ug/kg. The location of this sample is south of the former truck scale on the boundary be- <br /> tween two parcels. The soil samples obtained from 6 feet bgs at this location did not contain <br /> pesticide contaminants. Because fewer than 3 percent of the soil samples contain pesti- <br /> cides that remain in site soils, herbicides and pesticides do not appear to be constituents of <br /> concern at this site. <br /> Rationale <br /> Deere & Company excavated about 10,800 tons of soil from a footprint of about 29,000 <br /> square feet. The excavation removed about 4,200 pounds of nitrogen and about 1,900 <br /> pounds of sulfate to depths ranging from 2.5 and 7.5 feet below ground surface. <br /> Although sulfate and nitrogen remain in shallow groundwater beneath the site, on-site <br /> sources of nitrogen and sulfate in the soil have been removed. Concentrations of sulfate <br /> are decreasing in the monitoring well furthest from the adjacent bulk sulfur handling facility, <br /> and based on the trend line observed in Figure 2, water quality objectives are expected to <br /> be met by 2021. The sulfate concentration in monitoring well MW-4, adjacent to the sulfur <br /> handling facility is comparable to sulfate found beneath the sulfur facility and therefore is not <br /> believed to be associated with the Lesco facility. <br />