Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Stewart Black -4 - 28 February 2017 <br /> Multiple lines of evidence suggest that the arsenic release is not related to historical practic- <br /> es at the Lesco facility. These include the presence of native arsenic in soil, a documented <br /> presence of arsenic in shallow background wells, and the possibility that the site has been <br /> built on dredge spoils containing metals. Furthermore, the historical record does not suggest <br /> that arsenic or vanadium had been handled at this facility. <br /> The fertilizer handling operations have ceased, the structures have been removed, the ma- <br /> jority of the soil containing pollutants has been removed, and nitrogen concentrations in <br /> shallow groundwater have been removed from on-site well MW-4, and are decreasing in the <br /> downgradient well MW-3. Therefore, the declining trends are expected to continue, and wa- <br /> ter quality objectives are anticipated to be met in 2021. <br /> Extent defined <br /> Nitrogen in MW-4, adjacent to the excavation, has decreased to the water quality objective, <br /> and the same behavior is expected in MW-3, which is about 200 feet downgradient of the <br /> excavation. Nitrogen in this well has been decreasing since the excavation occurred. <br /> Estimated Residual Mass <br /> About 46 pounds of nitrogen remain in soil. This represents about 1.1% of the mass that <br /> was removed. <br /> Threat to Groundwater <br /> Residual material remaining in soil is a low threat to groundwater, based on its mass. <br /> Threat to Human Health <br /> ❑ Vapor Intrusion Hazard: The soil excavation removed vapor intrusion hazards to future <br /> site workers. <br /> ❑ Dermal Contact Hazard: The soil excavation also removed dermal contact hazards to <br /> future workers. <br /> Public Review <br /> On 27 October 2015, a 30-day public notice was circulated to landowners and tenants within <br /> a quarter mile radius of the site, and other interested parties. No comments were received <br /> by 1 December 2015. <br /> Summary <br /> Based on the above evaluations, the Central Valley Water Board staff concurs with Deere & <br /> Company that the remaining residual concentrations of nitrogen and sulfate at the former <br /> Lesco facility do not appear to present either a threat to water quality, human health, or the <br /> biota. <br />