Laserfiche WebLink
F, <br /> Talking ts <br /> The Department of Energy and the University of California have published a Draft Environmental <br /> Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (DEIS) for the continued operation and U.C. <br /> management of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The study also examines the <br /> impacts of the Sandia National Laboratory, located across the street from LLNL, and also devoted <br /> primarily to nuclear weapons-related work.The purpose of the DEIS is to allow interested members of <br /> the public and various public agencies to comment on the usefulness and adequacy of the <br /> document and on the need for the proposed project itself. <br /> Purpose and need <br /> The "preferred alternative" proposed here is continued operation of the Labs, along with all <br /> currently proposed expansions of operations. With the Cold War over, it is particularly appropri- <br /> ate to question the need for the main work of the Labs: the design and testing of nuclear <br /> weapons. <br /> Alternatives <br /> The DEIS does not systematically examine alternatives for the conversion of the Labs to non- <br /> weapons related work, Despite the expansion of significant non-weapons work at LLNL,the DEIS <br /> reveals no systematic planning for the future. This indicates that future "conversion" efforts are <br /> likely to focus on expensive "natural" outgrowth of nuclear weapons programs,and which only <br /> can be exploited by large corporations. One example of this trend is the Atomic Vapor Laser <br /> Isotope Separation (AVLIS) program, aimed at lowering the costs of producing enriched <br /> uranium and other fissionable materials for both weapons and nuclear power applications, <br /> Alternatives not considered include large scale redirection of Lab resources towards energy <br /> conservation, development of renewable energy sources, and environmental protection, <br /> A major focus of LLNL's weapons work is nuclear weapons testing. Despite the fact that a <br /> Comprehensive Test Ban (CTB) is certainly a reasonable possibility in the next decade and that <br /> many of the Lab's programs which use radioactive and hazardous materials are testing-related, <br /> the DEIS does not consider how Lab operations and environmental impacts would be changed <br /> by a CTB, <br /> Waste management <br /> The DEIS does not provide an account of hazardous and radioactive waste production on a <br /> program by program basis, This makes it difficult to weigh environmental risks of particular <br /> projects against their purported benefits. <br /> LLNL currently has no off-site disposal site for its radioactive and mixed radioactive and <br /> hazardous waste, As a consequence, radioactive waste is steadily accumulating at LLNL in <br /> facilities not constructed for permanent storage, <br /> The DEIS projects that the production of hazardous and radioactive waste at LLNL will increase <br /> over the next five years. <br />