My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1992
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SPERRY
>
1051
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504217
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2020 11:49:01 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:35:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1992
RECORD_ID
PR0504217
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0004231
FACILITY_NAME
J M EAGLE (WS)
STREET_NUMBER
1051
STREET_NAME
SPERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17728039
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1051 SPERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0504217_1051 SPERRY_1992.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
kn KLEINFELDER <br /> 4.2.2 Purpose and Methodology <br /> One of the objectives or maJjectives of this investigation was to evaluate the extent of asbestos in <br /> J <br /> surface soil outside of landfill areas to develop a "zero line" of asbestos presence for <br /> developing a remedial workplan for these areas. <br /> The remedial soil investigation included collection of samples on the site perimeter, the <br /> drainage canal, and locations outside of areas where asbestos had been previously detected. <br /> The investigation included surface and subsurface samples which were collected near the limits <br /> of and within estimated WMU landfill zones. <br /> Prior to sample collection, the sampling location was inspected for soil moisture content. If the <br /> soil appeared to be dry, distilled water was sprayed to reduce the release of dust particles. <br /> Surface vegetation and approximately 1 inch of soil was removed with a decontaminated hand <br /> shovel. A ground surface (GS) sample was then collected and placed in a zip lock plastic bag <br /> and labeled with a Kleinfelder sample label. <br /> A hand auger was used for 1-foot and 2-foot deep samples. A hole of approximately 18 inches <br /> in base diameter was excavated using a decontaminated hand shovel to depths of approximately <br /> 8 inches and 20 inches for the 1-foot and 2-foot deep samples respectively. This hole was <br /> excavated to reduce the potential for cross contamination between the ground surface and <br /> subsurface soil. A hand auger was then advanced to the depths of 12 inches and 24 inches <br /> from the original surface and soil samples were collected from the auger tip. The tools were <br /> decontaminated between each sample depth and location using a brush and distilled water. <br /> Soil samples were logged and transported to Kellco Analytical Laboratory for.PLM asbestos <br /> analysis under chain-of-custody at the end of each field day. <br /> 4.2.3 Analytical Methods <br /> Soil samples were submitted under chain-of-custody to Kellco Analytical Laboratory in <br /> Sacramento, California, which is certified by the State of California to perform bulk sample <br /> analysis for asbestos. Soil samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (EPA Method <br /> 600/M4-020). The analytical results were presented in percentage ranges of asbestos fibers <br /> detected as chrysotile, crocidolite, and amosite and other amphibole fibers. The limit of <br /> quantification for the analysis is approximately 1% by area. <br /> CR14-92-12 Page 11 of 39 24-220109-F09 <br /> Copyright 1992 KLeinfetder, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.