My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1992
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SPERRY
>
1051
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0504217
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2020 11:49:01 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:35:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1992
RECORD_ID
PR0504217
PE
4430
FACILITY_ID
FA0004231
FACILITY_NAME
J M EAGLE (WS)
STREET_NUMBER
1051
STREET_NAME
SPERRY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17728039
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1051 SPERRY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
CField
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4430_PR0504217_1051 SPERRY_1992.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KLEINFELDER <br /> The laboratory also reports the possible presence of asbestos at less than one percent. This is <br /> noted as < 1% on Table 4-3. These reported "trace" amounts of fiber may be asbestos at <br /> naturally-occurring background levels, minute amounts of wind-blown asbestos, or some other <br /> fiber mistaken for asbestos at these low levels. <br /> 4.2.4 Results <br /> Results of the analyses are shown on Drawing 2. Quantifiable levels (greater than or equal to. <br /> 1% asbestos) are indicated with bold type. Analytical results are summarized in Table 4-3. <br /> Results from the limited soil sampling conducted in 1990 (filled oval figures on Drawing 2 <br /> ) <br /> generally have higher concentrations of asbestos than the 1991 sampling. Kleinfelder believes <br /> the reason for this was that the prior investigation limited sampling to areas immediately <br /> adjacent to a prior use area, for example, the side of an old haul road. In many cases when <br /> the sampling was directed away from the use area, the surface asbestos levels decreased or <br /> asbestos was not detected. Asbestos was detected most frequently in the near-surface samples. <br /> Subsurface soil samples were generally free of asbestos. In four locations subsurface soils <br /> were also found to contain asbestos in excess of 1 percent. (Sample numbers 65880, 65798, <br /> 47158 and 68399. <br /> 4.2.5 Conclusions <br /> The surface soil investigation provides sufficient data to estimate the lateral extent of surface <br /> asbestos for the purpose of surface soil remediation. Plate 4-2 shows the areas where surface <br /> soil remediation is proposed. The method of remediation depends on the location of <br /> contamination and will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter 6. <br /> CR14-92-12 Page 12 of 39 24-220109-1709 <br /> Copyright 1992 Kleinfelder, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.