Laserfiche WebLink
d <br /> Z <br /> EDTd (Date/Initials) <br /> ED � 3gged <br /> Data Evaluation Checklist—GC/MS Analyses <br /> Project ID: nsJ P <br /> Method: <br /> Reviewer's Initials and Datc Reviewed: 1 �� 'p <br /> SDG: _ d 111/0 <br /> Review uestions Yes No NA <br /> 1• Were holding times met? �a1� ��laa _ V/ Sam le (Anal tes) Affected/Comments Fla <br /> Were sample preservation requirements met? <br /> 3. Was cooler receipt form completed? V <br /> 4. Was method blank analyzed with each batch?Did the blank <br /> meet QC criteria? <br /> S. Were target analytes reported in field blank or rinsate <br /> samples above the MDL? N� <br /> 6. Was a field duplicate analyzed?Were RPDs within project <br /> specifications? V/ <br /> 7. Was an LCS analyzed with each batch?Did recoveries meet <br /> QC criteria? <br /> 8. Was an MS/MSD pair analyzed with each batch?Were <br /> recoveries and BPDs within project specifications? <br /> 9. If an MS/MSD was not analyzed, was a LCS/L CSD <br /> analyzed?Were recoveries and RPDs wi in project-rfmits? <br /> 10. Were surrogate recoveries within project specifications? ✓ <br /> Initial Calibration: <br /> I I a. Were tune criteria met? <br /> 1 I b. Were SPCC and CCC criteria met? <br /> 1 1 c. Did all calibration analytes meet criteria? <br /> I Id. Did the second source initial calibration verification meet <br /> project criteria? <br /> Continuing Calibration: <br /> Ila. Were tune criteria met? <br /> 12b. Were SPCC and CCC criteria met? <br /> 12c. Did all calibration analytes meet criteria? <br /> 13. Did internal standards meet criteria? <br /> 14. Was the case narrative complete? <br />