Laserfiche WebLink
• w <br /> M� <br /> R <br /> Data Evaluation Cliecklist—Metals <br /> Location and Quarter: Method: x ' �O <br /> Reviewers Initials and Date Reviewed: SDG: <br /> Review Questions <br /> IWere holding times met? Yes No Sample(Analytes) Affected/Comments Flag <br /> , ��i� -� �- 3o i � ✓ <br /> 2. Were sample preservation requirements met? <br /> 3. Was cooler receipt form completed? / <br /> 4. Was method blank analyzed with each batch? ✓ "" <br /> 5. Were target analytes reported in the method blank below <br /> the MDL? if yes, evaluate low level determinations of <br /> target analytes. <br /> 6. Were target analytes reported in the method blank above <br /> the MDL? ✓ <br /> 7. Were target analytes reported in field blank or rinsate <br /> samples above the MDL? <br /> B. Was a field duplicate analyzed7 Were RPDs within <br /> contract specifications? <br /> 9. Was an LCS analyzed with each batch? <br /> 10. Were LCS recoveries within contract specifications? <br /> 11. Was an MS/MSD pair analyzed with each batch? / <br /> 12. Were MS/MSD recoveries and RPDs within contract <br /> specifications? Ih <br /> 13. Was a laboratory duplicate analyzed? Were RPDs with <br /> contract specifications? <br /> 14. Were calibration checks analyzed at the beginning of <br /> each run and after every 10 samples? Were recoveries NP <br /> within 90-110%. <br /> 15. Were lab comments included in report7 if yes, <br /> sununarize contents. <br />