Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION SHEET <br /> The City of Stockton proposes to discharge treated ground water from the <br /> extraction of ground water polluted by leakage from the unlined Class III <br /> landfill . Pol1uted ground water has been detected 1000 feet downgradi ent to the <br /> northeast of the landfill . The ground water treatment system is designed to <br /> treat 400 gpm (580,000 gpd) of extracted ground water. About 305 gpm (440,000 <br /> gpd) will be discharged to the north branch of the south fork of Littlejohns <br /> Creek tributary to the San Joaquin River. The north branch of the south fork of <br /> Littlejohns Creek is an intermittent stream maintained by the San Joaquin County <br /> Flood Control District primarily for the drainage of irrigation return flow. <br /> Pumped ground water will be treated by passing it through an air stripper, and <br /> the water discharged to a manhole prior to discharge to Littlejohns Creek. The <br /> stripped air is serially passed through two exchangeable activated carbon units. <br /> The activated carbon units are regenerated or disposed off-site. <br /> The proposed treatment system should be capable of dependably removing volatile <br /> organic constituents to non-detectable concentrations as determined by current <br /> analytical technology. The 30-day median effluent limitations have, therefore, <br /> been set to less-than the limit of detection (0.5 t&g/1) for 1,1 Dichloroethane, <br /> 1,2 Dichloroethane, Vinyl Chloride, Tetrachloroethene, and other volatile <br /> organics in EPA Methods 601. The Daily Maximum effluent concentrations are <br /> established to allow for some effluent quality variation and the false positive <br /> analytical results inherent in analyses near the limits of detection. For <br /> volatile organics, the Daily Maximum Effluent Limitation has been set at ten <br /> times the detection limit. <br /> Water quality objectives adopted pursuant to the Inland Surface Waters Plan are <br /> applicable to the discharge. The Discharger has not sampled for all substances <br /> in Table 1 and 2 of the Inland Surface Waters Plans (91-12-WQ); however, the <br /> Discharger will be required to conduct a study to determine whether regulated <br /> constituents are present in the discharge and if so, what effluent limits are <br /> necessary for compliance with water quality objectives. <br /> These waste discharge requirements will also function as the individual storm <br /> water permit for the proposed ground water treatment system and the entire Austin <br /> Road Class III Sanitary Landfill . This permit requires the Discharger to take <br /> steps necessary to reduce or eliminate industrial storm water pollution. The <br /> Discharger is also required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to <br /> prevent contaminants in the runoff from adversely affecting water quality. <br /> Chronic effluent toxicity monitoring will be required since the discharge will <br /> constitute at least fifty percent of the flow in the receiving water. The <br /> proposed chronic effluent toxicity monitoring should consist of chronic toxicity <br /> tests employing three species (PimephalesRromglis, Ceriodgphnia dubia, <br /> SelenastruM gARriggr_BMIUM) as specified in EPA 600/4-89/001 (March 1989) "Short- <br /> Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving <br /> Waters to Freshwater Organisms". <br /> If the chronic toxicity testing results indicates that the Discharger may be <br /> contributing toxicity to Littlejohns Creek, the Discharger shall submit a <br /> Technical Report containing and analyzing the results of the toxicity testing, <br />