Laserfiche WebLink
Facility Visit (9/18/92) - Austin Road Landfill Site Page 2 <br /> Facility No.- 39-AA-0001 <br /> accompanied by an August 12, 1992 Amendment to the RDSI was <br /> received at the Board on September 21, • 1992 . Board staff is <br /> currently reviewing the proposed permit and amended RDSI. In <br /> anticipation of the Board considering a permit revision for this <br /> facility at the November Board meeting, Board Comp" lance staff have <br /> arranged an inspection in conjunction with an inspection by your <br /> staff for October 20, 1992 . <br /> As noted in March 10, 1992 Board correspondence [Compliance <br /> Agreement- Leachate Control, Austin Road Landfill Site (39-AA- <br /> 0001) ] to your agency, "the SWFP revision process can proceed if: <br /> (1) The operator is making diligent progress in the implementation <br /> of the 8/91 Corrective Action Plan that was required to address the <br /> treatment of the site's contaminated groundwater. . .RWQCB staff will <br /> take the lead role in ensuring your office and the Board that the <br /> operator is making diligent progress in implementing the required <br /> Corrective Action Plan. " Please provide Board staff with an update <br /> �7 by October 20, 1992 on the operator's progress in implementing the <br /> Corrective Action Plan. <br /> This 3/10/92 correspondence also noted, "the SWFP revision process <br /> can proceed if: (2) A "compliance agreement" , that prohibits the <br /> continued disposal of all landfill gas condensate (including return <br /> condensate as well as condensate collected by in-line traps) by a <br /> date certain, can be reached. " Your June 3, 1992 correspondence <br /> [Gas Condensate, City of Stockton Austin Road Landfill, Facility <br /> No. 39-AA-0001, San Joaquin County] , required the operator to <br /> "begin testing the return condensate and/or the wastewater <br /> collected by in-line traps to determine if the condensate is a <br /> hazardous waste. Apply criteria specified in CCR, Title 22, <br /> Article 11. " Pacific Energy, in July 29, 1992 correspondence to <br /> your office, indicated that "the condensate is not considered a <br /> hazardous waste; therefore, the disposal of condensate to the <br /> landfill may be continued until October 9, 1993 . " At Mr. Wickes' <br /> request, Board staff provided comments regarding Pacific Energy's <br /> 7/29/92 Condensate Testing Report. In August 19, 1992 Board <br /> correspondence [Condensate Characterization Tests for Austin Road <br /> Landfill] , it was noted that "the condensate was not fully <br /> characterized. . .for all STLC and TCLP hazardous constituents. All <br /> compounds listed as STLC's or TCLP's and not tested for (marked NR) <br /> should have an individualexplanation why the test was not <br /> performed. " Please provide Board staff with an update by October <br /> 20, 1992 on the operator' s progress in complying with the <br /> requirements and achievement of the milestones set forth in your <br /> June 3 , 1992 correspondence [Gas Condensate. . . ] . <br /> If you have questions or comments regarding this correspondence, <br /> please call me at 916-255-2458, Brad Williams, your Compliance <br />