Laserfiche WebLink
City of Stockton <br /> Austin Rd. Landfill <br /> Diesel Spill <br /> acted as an impermeable layer and prevented the diesel fuel from <br /> migrating beneath the depth of the asphalt. <br /> On August 28, a backhoe was used to excavate an estimated 25 <br /> cubic yards of contaminated soil from the three locations. The <br /> excavated soil was screened using a hand held photoionization <br /> detector (PID) . Upon completion of excavation activities, the PID <br /> and personal observation were used to confirm that all required <br /> excavation had been completed. All PID reading of the residual, <br /> native soil in the excavation areas were non-detect, and there was <br /> no odors emanating from the excavation. The excavations were then <br /> backfilled with clean Roadbase that had been obtained by Forward <br /> staff. Excavated soil was immediately transported to the nearby <br /> Forward, Inc. Landfill, and stockpiled in Waste Management Area G <br /> of that Landfill. All excavation activities were performed under <br /> the observation and supervision of Ms. Resch and an engineer from <br /> the City of Stockton. <br /> On August 28, 1991 Forward staff took two soil samples from <br /> the excavated soil stockpiled at WMA-G at the Forward Landfill. <br /> The samples were taken from portions of the stockpile where the <br /> diesel odor was most pungent. The samples were composited into <br /> one sample and submitted under strict chain-of-custody to FGL <br /> Analytical Services, Stockton, California. The sample was analyzed <br /> for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH (d) ) . Lab results <br /> yielded TPH(d) results of 26 Parts Per Million (PPM) . At this <br /> concentration, Forward Landfill is permitted to directly dispose of <br /> the soil in one its waste disposal units. Permission was granted <br /> by Greg Oliveira of PHS to proceed with appropriate disposal of the <br /> stockpiled soil, under regulatory approval no. 91-121. <br /> Regulatory officials have indicated that they consider the <br /> release incident closed and the contamination to have been <br /> remediated. Please call me if you have any questions. <br /> 2 <br />