My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 9:40:02 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1989-1996
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1989-1996.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
660
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Periodic Site Review <br /> 4 of 4 <br /> Engineered environmental controls include, but are not <br /> limited to, the following: (consider each one separately) <br /> 1. Gas monitoring and control system <br /> 2. Leachate monitoring, control and treatment systems <br /> 31. Holding ponds for liquids <br /> 4 . Drainage/erosion control system <br /> 5. Revegetation/reclamation of final surfaces <br /> G. Other (specify) <br /> Summary of Recommendation and Conclusions <br /> Have all problem areas at the facility been identified with <br /> respect to site design, operation and engineered environmental <br /> controls? Have recommendations been made for workable solutions <br /> to improve the problem. areas? Are these solutions consistent <br /> with current CWMB regulations, technology, other regulatory <br /> agency regulations, site conditions (climate, geography, geology, <br /> etc. ) , and the actual capability of the operator to carry Out the <br /> recommendations? Do conclusions specify why certain methods were <br /> recommended to improve the site conditions? <br /> If the current design and operation of the facility do not <br /> adversely affect the environment, public health or safety, do the <br /> conclusions specify reasons for this determination? <br /> In summary, the purpose of the Periodic Site Review is to assure <br /> that all conditions at a landfill have been evaluated with <br /> respect to the environment, public health and safety. The <br /> engineer then makes recommendations to enhance site conditions <br /> based on conclusions developed during the review. If no <br /> recommendations for site improvements are necessary, the engineer <br /> will document the reasons for this conclusion. <br /> April 1989 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.