My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1989-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 9:40:02 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1989-1996
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1989-1996.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
660
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• A <br /> t <br /> Periodic Site Review <br /> 3 of 4 <br /> Analysis - Continued <br /> 4 . Ancillary operations, salvaging, composting, recycling, <br /> etc. <br /> 5. Daily landfilling operations <br /> a. type of waste received and amount <br /> b. loading, unloading, special waste handling <br /> C. spreading and compaction <br /> d. individual yell devdlopmen-v <br /> e.' cover: periodic, intermediate, final <br /> f. excavation of cover <br /> g. availability of cover and quality with respect to <br /> meeting regulations <br /> h. grading practices <br /> i. traffic flow <br /> j . other (specify) <br /> 6. Ongoing controls <br /> a. fire prevention <br /> b. dust prevention <br /> c. vector and bird control <br /> d* litter control <br /> e. noise control <br /> f. odor control <br /> g. other (specify) <br /> C. Engineered environmental controls® are there existing <br /> engineered environmental controls at the facility? If yes, <br /> do these controls effectively protect the environment, <br /> public health and safety? How? Are they properly <br /> engineered for remainder of site life? If not, what <br /> recommendations could be made to improve controls? <br /> If there are no engineered environmental controls at the <br /> site, should there be? Give recommendations for <br /> implementing proper controls for the site and explain <br /> reasons for choosing those control methods. <br /> If the site has no engineered environmental controls, and if <br /> you determine that without controls, the site will-not <br /> adversely affect the environment public health and safety, <br /> give reasons for this conclusion. <br /> April 1989 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.