My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11I. Environmental Setting, Impacts,and Mitigations <br /> E. Cultural Resources <br /> next closest recorded archaeological site is CA-SJo-202, a prehistoric site located approximately <br /> on and a quarter miles to the northeast. <br /> IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The CEQA Guidelines provide the general framework for evaluating the potential impacts of a <br /> proposed project on cultural resources. Pursuant to Section 15065(x)of the CEQA Guidelines, <br /> the elimination of"important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory" <br /> would be a significant impact on the environment. Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines <br /> specifies that a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it would"disrupt or <br /> adversely affect a prehistoric or historic archaeological site or a property of historic or cultural <br /> significance to a community or ethnic or social group." Appendix K of the CEQA Guidelines <br /> states that a significant negative environmental impact on the environment would be caused by <br /> the disruption or destruction of an"important archaeological resource," which is defined as a <br /> resource that: <br /> • is associated with an event or person of recognized significance in California or American <br /> history,or recognized scientific importance in prehistory; <br /> • can provide information which is both of demonstrable public interest and useful in <br /> addressing scientifically consequential and reasonable or archaeological research questions; <br /> • has a special or particular quality such as oldest,best example,largest,or last surviving <br /> example of its kind; <br /> • is at least 100 years old and possesses substantial stratigraphic integrity;or <br /> • involves important research questions that historical research has shown can be answered <br /> only with archaeological methods. <br /> Impact E.I. The Austin Road Landfill Expansion area,with Little Johns Creek running <br /> through it,is a potential candidate for locating additional and/or disturbing subsurface <br /> cultural deposits. (SIGNIFICANT) <br /> The study area has deep alluvial deposits,and there is a moderate to high possibility of <br /> subsurface archaeological deposits. Materials such as arrow and spear points,mortars and <br /> pestles, shell and bone dietary remains, and stone or adobe walls or foundations could be found. <br /> These materials may provide information which is useful in addressing scientifically <br /> YP g y <br /> III.E.3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.