My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2015
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:49 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:46:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2015
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440004_6484 N WAVERLY_2015.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
724
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Interpretation of SGI Interface Shear Strength Test Results <br />Foothill Sanitary Landfill - Area 2A Liner System <br />Page 11 <br />8/4/15 <br />® understanding g g the Design Engineer has been asked to obtain a variance to the contract <br />specifications for this difference and they approved the use of the supplied GM and GC <br />materials. These findings are in agreement with AES (2015). <br />• Based on single and multi -interface direct shear tests, the critical interface for the base <br />liner interfaces tested is the GM/GCL interface. These tests also show the base liner <br />system components tested by SGI meet or exceed the project specified post -peak <br />strength envelope. These findings also are in agreement with AES (2015). <br />• If the geosynthetics and soils used during actual construction differ from the materials <br />tested by SGI, the critical interface and lowest post -peak strength envelope could <br />change. <br />• If the design is based on single interface testing, it is recommended that different required <br />strength envelopes be used for different liner system configurations because the critical <br />interface is dependent on the components included and the applied normal stresses (Stark <br />and Choi, 2004). <br />• Stark et al. (2015) and ASTM D7702 discuss the advantages and disadvantages of multi - <br />interface tests. In practice, multi -interface tests are being used for liner system design <br />® and if there is an anomaly with the multi -interface test results, single interface tests can <br />be conducted to clarify the test results. However in this project, single interface tests <br />were specified and multi -interface tests were used to verify the combination strength <br />envelope from the single interface tests. Regardless, the multi -interface strength <br />envelopes measured herein are in agreement with the single interface test results, which <br />matches the data in Stark et al. (2015). <br />If you have any questions or if I can provide any additional information, please contact me. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />Timothy D. Stark, Ph.D., P.E. <br />v <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.