Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. R5-2003-0049 -7- <br /> FORWARD INC. AND ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES <br /> FOR OPERATION OF <br /> FORWARD CLASS II LANDFILL <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 32. The Board may specify a non-statistical data analysis method pursuant to Section <br /> 20080(a)(1) of Title 27. Section 13360(a)(1)of the California Water Code allows the Board <br /> to specify requirements to protect underground or surface waters from leakage from a solid <br /> waste site,which includes a method to provide the best assurance of determining the earliest <br /> possible detection of a release. <br /> 33. In order to provide the best assurance of the earliest possible detection of a release of non- <br /> naturally occurring waste constituents from a Unit,this Order specifies a non-statistical <br /> method for the evaluation of monitoring data. <br /> 34. The specified non-statistical method for evaluation of monitoring data provides two criteria <br /> (or triggers) for making the determination that there has been a release of non-naturally <br /> occurring waste constituents from a Unit. The presence of two non-naturally occurring waste <br /> constituents above their respective method detection limit(MDL), or one non-naturally <br /> occurring waste constituent detected above its practical quantitation limit(PQL), indicates <br /> that a release of waste from a Unit has occurred. Following an indication of a release, <br /> verification testing will be conducted to determine whether there has been a release from the <br /> Unit, or there is a source of the detected constituents other than the landfill, or the detection <br /> was a false detection. Although the detection of one non-naturally occurring waste <br /> constituent above its MDL is sufficient to provide for the earliest possible detection of a <br /> release, the detection of two non-naturally occurring waste constituents above the MDL as a <br /> trigger is appropriate due to the higher risk of false-positive analytical results and the <br /> corresponding increase in sampling and analytical expenses from the use of one non- <br /> naturally occurring waste constituent above its MDL as a trigger. <br /> GROUNDWATER DEGRADATION <br /> 35. Significant VOC impacts to groundwater including but not limited to dichloroethane, <br /> dichloroethylene,tetrachloroethylene, and trichloroethylene are associated with the old <br /> Austin Road Landfill,now the north Unit at Forward landfill. Impacts were initially detected <br /> in 1989,by 1991 evaluation monitoring determined that chlorinated hydrocarbons impacts <br /> extended as far as 1,000 feet down-gradient from the Austin Road landfill. A corrective <br /> action was approved in 1991,by 1998 it was apparent that the initial corrective actions had <br /> failed to remediate the groundwater impacts. In June 2002 the Board adopted Order No. R5- <br /> 2002-0121 to implement revised corrective actions and remediate groundwater impacts. All <br /> outstanding corrective active provisions adopted in the previous order are continued in this <br /> order. <br /> 36. The old Forward Landfill has a history of sporadic, low concentration detections of VOCs in <br /> groundwater since monitoring began in 1987. VOCs have most commonly been detected in <br /> the northeast corner of the old Forward Landfill site. The most frequently detected VOCs <br /> are: benzene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene,tetrachloroethene, toluene, 1,1-dichloroethane, and <br />