Laserfiche WebLink
Consolidated Forward Inc. Landfill <br />Page 19 <br />Future design for the vertical expansion will, if necessary, include additional <br />components in the liner system, depending on future differential settlement on the <br />liner system. <br />The extraction wells proposed as part of the Revised Engineering Feasibility Study <br />(AEE, 2001B) will be maintained and monitored during combined landfill build -out <br />phases, and modified as needed based on the RWQCB's review of monitoring data. <br />The appropriate responsible agencies, the CIWMB and RWQCB, shall conduct a <br />review of the liner and leachate collection system for the vertical expansion over the <br />existing landfill(s) proposed in the JTD. <br />49 (F.6) <br />Proposed as Part of the Project: <br />Because of the potential for contamination from WMU B and/or A of the shallow <br />groundwater table downgradient and adjacent to the project, existing domestic off- <br />site wells within 500 feet of the eastern property boundary will be sampled at the <br />same frequency as the monitoring wells onsite and for the same constituents (see <br />CCR, Title 27). Final determination of the sampling program and the evaluation of <br />the test results, along with the appropriate mitigation, is the responsibility of the <br />RWQCB and must be carried out under their permit authorization. <br />Identified in This EIR: <br />Water quality at the offsite wells, such as the two private wells along Austin Road <br />and the CYA wells, shall be monitored at least biannually (twice a year) to determine <br />the extent that the plume impacts them. Continued operation of the groundwater <br />extraction system at the site will help limit the contaminant plume from expanding <br />in a downgradient direction but will not address the offsite component far beyond <br />the boundary of Austin Road Landfill unless the contamination is attenuated and <br />diluted over time or more extraction wells are brought on line per the AEE (2001b) <br />Alternative 3 proposal. However, in their revised AEE (2002a) report the proposed <br />alternative 11 is put forth as the only remedy to implement at this time. The <br />RWQCB accepted alternative 11 in their letter to Forward dated March 11, 2002. If <br />the groundwater VOC concentrations do not attenuate at a rate that is acceptable to <br />the RWQCB then the Board will require that Alternative 3 - or some variant on <br />Alternative 3 - be implemented. The recent (AEE, 2002a) addendum to the corrective <br />action proposed procedures to analyze the hydrochemcial trends and trigger <br />concentrations at which additional extraction wells would be considered. (Atkinson, <br />2002). <br />50 (F.7) <br />Identified in This EIR: <br />Two infiltration methods are currently used at the landfill. Most of the groundwater <br />currently pumped by the former agricultural well is used onsite; thus, some of it will <br />infiltrate through the unlined parts of the site and migrate back to the groundwater <br />aquifer from where it was extracted. Secondly, the treated groundwater from the <br />