Laserfiche WebLink
Consolidated Forward Inc. Landfill <br />Page 20 <br />groundwater extraction system is discharged into Littlejohn Creek currently, which <br />both recharges aquifers below and moves offsite. <br />Treated groundwater from the groundwater extraction system is proposed to be <br />infiltrated back to the aquifer through an infiltration basin (AEE, 2001B, 2002a) <br />located near well MW -11. The infiltration basin would improve recharge to the local <br />aquifer and is also designed to create a hydraulic barrier to inhibit further northward <br />migration of the groundwater plume. The RWQCB letter to Forward dated March <br />11, 2002 agreed to allow for their recharge remedy (Alternative 11) to go forward <br />without Alternative 3 (extended pumping) while quarterly monitoring at the <br />groundwater wells occurs. If the groundwater VOC concentrations do not attenuate <br />at a rate that is acceptable to the RWQCB then the Board will require that Alternative <br />3, or some variant on Alternative 3, be implemented. The recent (AEE, 2002x) <br />addendum to the corrective action proposed procedures to analyze the <br />hydrochemical trends and trigger concentrations at which additional extraction <br />wells would be considered. (Atkinson, 2002). <br />51 (F.9) <br />Identified in This EIR: <br />Replacement wells (as well as additional wells north of the Austin Road Landfill to <br />better define the leading edge of the plume) shall be installed to mitigate against the <br />loss of old wells as presented in the JTD currently under review by the RWQCB. The <br />RWQCB must approve the JTD's plans for the number and location of the new wells <br />as part of their approval process, which is separate from the EIR approval process. <br />52 Austin 1994 (K3.c), Austin 2000 (K3.c) <br />The timing of the pumped discharge from the detention pond must not occur with the peak <br />flow rate of Little John's Creek as this would impact downstream locations by increasing the <br />flood hazard. Telemetry, which monitors the flow in the creek to determine the peak, should <br />be provided. This information should then be used to coordinate the start up of the pumps. <br />53 Austin 1994 (KS.e), Austin 2000 (KS.e) <br />The landfill operator would include practices and procedures in the SWFP to comply with <br />AB 1760. The procedures would describe how the expanded landfill would salvage all <br />economically feasible metallic discards. <br />54 Forward 1993 (0) <br />Diesel fuel should be stored in a manner which provides for secondary containment. <br />G. SOILS AND GEOLOGY <br />55 (G.2) <br />Proposed as Part of the Project: <br />Should additional cover material be needed, alternative daily covers, approved by <br />the CIWMB, will be examined and used. <br />56 (G.3) <br />