Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 5b presents the net flux as a function of depth through the modeled profile <br /> for several different cover thicknesses and clearly illustrate the negative flux <br /> potential increasing(i.e., total system performance improving) as the cover <br /> section thins. <br /> 5.0 DISCUSSION <br /> 5.1 INFILTRATION <br /> As clearly shown in Figure 4, a substantial drying of final cover soils constructed at the <br /> FSL is expected. As indicated on Figure 5, this drying is expected to result in cumulative <br /> negative flux of as much as—12.60 inches per year for the 4-foot cover section. <br /> 5.2 LANDFILL GAS EMISSIONS <br /> Title 27 CCR indicates that another purpose for final covers is to control surface <br /> emissions of landfill gas. In fact, the placement of additional, similar cover soils as a part <br /> of final closure is expected to yield superior surface emissions performance relative to the <br /> existing interim cover. Since the landfill has not exhibited excessive surface emissions <br /> under interim closure conditions, landfill gas emissions are not expected be problematic <br /> after completion of the final cover. <br /> 5.3 MAINTENANCE <br /> As noted above, the ultimate performance of the proposed 4-foot cover section will be <br /> very sensitive to the establishment and maintenance of an effective plant community over <br /> the closure area. As a result,routine inspection and as-needed repair(and reseeding) of <br /> the cover area should be anticipated. <br /> 5.4 COST <br /> The modeling completed to date and reported herein, indicates that a non-prescriptive <br /> final cover system constructed using available on-site soils would be consistent with the <br /> performance goal addressed by the prescriptive standard and would afford equivalent or <br /> superior protection against water quality impairment. In addition, while it is estimated <br /> that closure construction costs would be the same for the prescriptive and alternative <br /> covers discussed herein (i.e., the alternative will be constructed to a prescriptive as-built <br /> standard), post-closure maintenance of the prescriptive cover to it's as-built condition <br /> would be extremely expensive(likely requiring reconstruction every few years) and <br /> almost certainly ineffective since desiccation can occur in a matter of weeks or months. <br /> 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The results obtained from the LEACHM analysis (Figure 5) indicate that four feet of final <br /> cover material constructed and maintained as discussed herein will perform effectively at <br /> the site and this cover section is therefore recommended. <br /> -11- <br /> C:\20050082\FOR WARD/Fonvar(ICOV ER.DOC\7/t J/2005 <br /> Geologic Associates <br />