Laserfiche WebLink
2. RDSI Amendments <br />° We concede that the RDSI for the facility should be updated to <br />reflect the types of waste counted in the tonnage caps and the <br />information required since the final approval of the ADC <br />regulations in June 2004. We will submit an outline of the <br />proposed RDSI changes in the action plan submitted to the LEA on <br />May i6, 2005. <br />3. Processed Green Material <br />❖ Since the LEA has indicated that the processing of Stockton green <br />material to remove food waste has been inadequate, we will propose <br />an alternative program for managing that waste stream in the <br />action plan submitted on May 16, TAT_ A:- ute Board staffs <br />policy interpretation of the composting and ADC regulations that <br />would eliminate the ability of solid waste facilities from using as <br />ADC curbside green waste from jurisdictions that allow residents to <br />include small amounts of food waste in the green waste bins. <br />4. Areas of Concern <br />❖ Several areas of concern were raised in the report regarding the <br />beneficial reuse and ADC usage reports. These issues will be <br />addressed under Item#1 above and requested reports will be <br />submitted promptly to the LEA and Board staff. <br />We believe that many of the issues raised in the Report of Inspection can be <br />resolved with a mutually agreeable report format and continued open and <br />effective communication. We will approach future meetings and discussions on <br />the issues raised in a reasonable and cooperative manner. However, we will not <br />hesitate to use our right to appeal the findings in the Report of Inspection or <br />subsequent enforcement actions related to those findings if we are convinced that <br />those findings or actions are not supported by past practices, CEQA documents, <br />hearing records or the permit and RDSI. <br />Sincerely, <br />Forward I <br />�4 <br />Kevin Basso <br />0 cc: Geralda Stryker, Supervising IWMS <br />