ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_3 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DRAFT 27CCR. The facility was also cited for lack of daily cover Section 20680 of 27CCR and for accepting un-treated medical waste Section 20880 27CCR (see exhibit H). On November 20, 2003, Michael Kith and Ted Tasiopoulis employees of the EHD conducted routine inspection and noted that the concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probes GP-8 (which replaces GP-3) and GP-9 (which replaces GP-2), both of which were located near the west boundary, was 9% and 41%, respectively. This was documented under the violation of Explosive Gases Control, Section 20919.5 of 27CCR. (see exhibit I). On December 23, 2003, Michael Kith and Ted Tasiopoulis employees of the EHD conducted routine inspection and noted that the concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probes GP-8 (which replaces GP-3) and GP-9 (which replaces GP-2), both of which were located near the west boundary, was 9.5% and 44%, respectively. This was documented under the violation of Explosive Gases Control, Section 20919.5 of 27CCR (see exhibit J). On January 14, 2004, at the request of CIWMB, LEA amended the Notice and Order 03- 01 so that the violations cited for the Explosive Gas Control were consistent for 3 consecutive months. On January 30, 2004, Michael Kith and Ted Tasiopoulis employees of the EHD • conducted routine inspection and noted that the concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probes GP-8 (which replaces GP-3) and GP-9 (which replaces GP-2), both of which were located near the west boundary,was 48% and 45%, respectively. This was documented under the violation of Explosive Gases Control, Section 20919.5 of 27CCR. The facility was cited for an Area of Concern for Self Monitoring, Section, 44014 (b), PRC (see exhibit K) On February 2, 2004, the EHD issued the Amended Notice and Order 03-01 to the owner/operator of the facility for the violation of the explosive gas control, 27CCR20919.5 (see exhibit L). On February 27, 2004, Michael Kith and Ted Tasiopoulis employees of the EHD conducted routine inspection and noted that the concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probes GP-8 (which replaces GP-3) and GP-9 (which replaces GP-2), both of which were located near the west boundary, was 45% and 45%, respectively. This was documented under the violation of Explosive Gases Control, Section 20919.5 of 27CCR (see exhibit M). On March 2, 2004, the EHD received a progress report for Amended Notice and Order 03-01. According to the progress report,the operator/owner proposed to install 52 gas extraction wells in 3 different phases. All new gas extraction wells would be connected to the existing flare station. •