My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 1:06:23 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2006
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2006.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
579
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It should be noted that in no event will any combination of the above-listed <br /> beneficial use materials and refuse exceed the maximum daily limit of 8,668 TPD <br /> To establish the limits for the materialsADC C shown above, Forward reviewed 2005 <br /> weight and volume records, which provided the maximum daily need for each <br /> material. Additionally, the 2005 total for each material was also divided by the <br /> permitted number of working days per year to establish the average daily need <br /> Forward also conducted field tests at the landfill to determine refuse-to-cover ratios <br /> and in-place densities for those beneficial re-use materials utilized as ADC the <br /> . Forward <br /> conducted the test for green waste several years ago and documented the results in <br /> a December 20, 2002 letter to Ms. Donna Heran, Director, San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Division. Forward conducted the test for treated auto <br /> shredder residue in December 2005. This T-D ^ .,,damn deewnents the results f <br /> that testIn addition, the following procedures were used to provide control for those <br /> field tests conducted: 1) a specific ADC material is weighed and loaded into a <br /> dump truck; 2) a dozer then spreads the ADC material over the designated field <br /> test area (which is measured in square feet); 3) the ADC material is compacted to <br /> the minimum required thickness in accordance with 27 CCR or as approved by <br /> the LEA; and 4) using the recorded weight of the material it is determined how <br /> much ADC material (in tons) was used to cover the measured test area (in square <br /> feet). The results from these tests were utilized to develop the refuse-to-cover ratio <br /> and density information presented in Appendix C-1. Sections 4.5 and 6.4.6 <br /> discusses the thickness of the various types of ADC reflected in the above maximum <br /> limits. <br /> To estimate the average need „-,-.xirn,, n '; of contaminated soil shown above, <br /> Forward reviewed current (2005) waste inflow records to calculate a soil quantity, <br /> and eperatiens layer eenstFuetien efl the same day. Altheugh there aFe Faany <br /> these needs existed en the safne net eeRsideFed-r-ea c-.—To estimate the <br /> maximum limit for contaminated soils, shown above, Forward used the ratio of <br /> refuse to cover soil shown in Sections 4.5 and 6.4.7, and the invoiced quantities of <br /> operations layer constructed during 2004 and 2005 cell construction. <br /> Forward Landfill JTD 4-9 <br /> J:\Allied\Forward\JTD Amendment\March 2006 JTD-LEA Resp\JTDUTD Sec 4 Rev.doc: <br /> 05/24/02;Amendment No. 1: 5/22/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.