Laserfiche WebLink
Carol n Carolla-Res onse to.LEA comments.doc Pa e 4 <br /> Revise to remove any reference to discussion with the LEA. <br /> Response: Section 4.3.1 has been revised to delete the reference to <br /> discussions with the LEA. <br /> Comment 11: The JTD, Page 4-9, Section 4.3.1, indicates that the soil needs for <br /> daily, intermediate, and operations layers were added together to <br /> derive the maximum contaminated soil limit. The actual site needs <br /> should reflect an average and not a peak amount. Revise to <br /> include a reasonable average tonnage limit. <br /> Response: Based on current records (2005), Section 4.3.1 was revised to <br /> provide actual site needs for the acceptance of beneficial reuse <br /> materials for both daily average and maximum limits. <br /> Comment 12: The JTD, Page 4-9, Section 4.3.2, states, "Therefore, on days when <br /> less waste is received the site can accept more loads of the <br /> beneficial reuse materials." Would the number of additional loads of <br /> beneficial reuse material be based on site needs? If the material <br /> accepted were for future use, how would it be handled, stored and <br /> tracked? Please explain. <br /> Response: Section 4.3.2 has been revised. <br /> Comment 13: On Page 4-10, Section 4.5, of the JTD, "weekly averages" is worded <br /> such that it appears that the facility is accepting "35,987 tons, six <br /> days a week." Revise to reflect actual conditions at the site. <br /> Response: Section 4.5 has been revised. <br /> Comment 14: The JTD, Page 4-11, Section 4.5, states "discussions with the LEA <br /> resulted in the conclusions that ash and cement kiln dust are <br /> believed to have similar properties to PGM and that C&D material is <br /> believed to have similar properties to treated auto shredder residue." <br /> See comment 10 listed above. There was no conversation <br /> regarding similar properties. It was based on the fact that the <br /> facility uses very little or no ash and cement kiln dust as ADC. <br /> Revise to remove any, reference to the discussion with the LEA. <br /> Response: Section 4.5 has been revised to delete the reference to discussions <br /> with the LEA. <br /> Comment 15: The JTD, Page 4-12, Section 4.7.1, indicates that the site life <br /> estimate is reduced. This issue was raised on the previous JTD <br /> amendment review (August 2005). The Environmental Health <br /> Department (EHD) asked for an explanation in writing of the change <br /> 4 <br /> JAMiefforwardUM Amendment\March 2006 JTD - LEA RespWTMesponse to LEA comments.doc; 5/16/2006 <br />