Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Don Litchfield <br /> October 8, 2010 <br /> Page 3 <br /> concentrations in excess of 5 percent by volume were detected at any location tested(Table 1), <br /> with the exceptions of LFG Monitoring Probe Nos. GP-IOS, GP-I ID, GP-11M and GP-11S (up <br /> to 57.6%by volume). SCS will continue to monitor Perimeter Probes defined as Nos. GP-09, <br /> GP-10, GP-11 and GP-12 on a weekly basis and all probes quarterly as directed by the Client. <br /> SCS understands that the probe network is under review by the CIWMB to enable relocation of <br /> the probes to the property boundary. The next complete quarterly probe monitoring is due by the <br /> end of December 2010, or as directed by the client. <br /> In August 2010, SCS performed monitoring of Temporary Gas Probe Nos. TGP-01 through <br /> TGP-39, as directed by the Client. Additionally, on September 1, 2010, SCS performed <br /> monitoring of TGP-38B (Table 1). Results of the quarterly monitoring indicated that methane <br /> gas concentrations in excess of 5 percent by volume were detected at many of the location tested <br /> (up to 57.5%by volume). Note,that these probes are intended for evaluation purposes only and <br /> are not compliance locations. SCS will complete the next quarterly monitoring by the end of <br /> December 2010. <br /> ON -SITE STRUCTURE MONITORING <br /> In accordance with the approved testing schedule,the interiors of the on-site structures are to be <br /> tested quarterly. On September 14, 2010, SCS performed the required testing for the third <br /> quarter 2010. Results indicated that no methane gas was detected at any location tested. The <br /> results were included in our third quarter 2010 probe and structure monitoring report. The next <br /> quarterly interior structure monitoring is due by the end of December 2010. <br /> LFG EXTRACTION WELL TESTING <br /> System adjustments are required whenever an extraction well exhibits an unacceptable change in <br /> methane and/or oxygen gas concentration (which could be due to an overpull or underpull <br /> condition). Overpull occurs when the extraction rate of a particular extraction well exceeds that <br /> of the LFG generation rate within the radius of influence of the well. During this overpull <br /> condition, air can be drawn through the ground surface to the extraction well and then ultimately <br /> be injected into the flare. If an excessive overpull condition is allowed to continue for a long <br /> period, a significant drop in the methane gas content of the LFG and/or a subsurface landfill fire <br /> could occur. <br /> Underpull occurs when the extraction rate of a particular extraction well is less than the <br /> generation rate within the radius of influence of the well. This condition could result in off-site <br /> subsurface LFG migration and/or surface emissions. <br /> Results of monthly testing of LFG extraction wells performed on September 1, 3, 7, 14, 17, 18, <br /> 20 and 21, 2010, (Table 2) indicate that several extraction wells exhibited an overpull and/or <br /> underpull condition. These conditions are necessary to maintain operational criteria(e.g. <br /> maintain a minimum 1400 degrees Fahrenheit flare exit gas temperature)at the BFS,to help <br />