Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 AUSTIN UNIT <br /> 3.1 WATER QUALITY MONITORING <br /> 3.1.1 Sampling and Laboratory Analyses <br /> During the fourth quarter 2011, depth-to-water measurements were recorded and the <br /> Austin Unit's DMP and CAP groundwater monitoring wells were sampled by Del-Tech <br /> on November 3 and 8, 2011. In addition, surface water stations ASW-1 and ASW-2 were <br /> sampled on November 7, 2011. <br /> Samples were collected from each sample point with sufficient liquid and submitted to <br /> BC for analysis of the parameters stipulated in RWQCB Order No. R5-2003-0049. Table <br /> 2-1 presents the monitoring schedule and summarizes the analytical methods utilized <br /> during the current monitoring period. Water quality samples were also analyzed in the <br /> field for ORP, turbidity, temperature, specific conductance, and pH and recorded on well <br /> data sheets. The groundwater monitoring wells and leachate were sampled in accordance <br /> with the sampling and analysis procedures detailed in Appendix B. The well data sheets, <br /> raw laboratory data, certificates of analyses, and chain-of-custody records related to the <br /> sampling program are included in Appendix C. Field and laboratory analyses are <br /> summarized in Tables 3-1 through 3-6. <br /> 3.1.2 QA/QC Results <br /> The QA/QC program completed for the fourth quarter 2011 water quality monitoring <br /> event at the Austin Unit included analyses of three field blanks, four trip blanks, and <br /> three laboratory method blanks. The trip, field, and equipment blanks were analyzed for <br /> VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and method blanks were analyzed for all required analyses. <br /> The results of the QA/QC program indicate that no VOCs were detected in the QA/QC <br /> blanks during the fourth quarter 2011 monitoring period. During the fourth quarter 2011 <br /> monitoring event, a duplicate sample was collected from DMP well AW-13 and <br /> labeled DUP. Duplicate groundwater results are presented along with the primary data in <br /> Table 3-1. For quantifiable concentrations (greater than the PQL),the duplicate sample <br /> analyses yielded good correlation(within 7%)with the primary sample. Review of <br /> laboratory analysis dates with required holding times indicates that all samples were <br /> submitted and analyzed within the required holding times during the fourth quarter 2011. <br /> Based on the results of the laboratory blank and duplicate analyses, it is concluded that <br /> generally acceptable QA/QC procedures were exercised and the water quality samples <br /> collected from the Austin Unit appear to be representative of water quality at the site. <br /> 3.1.3 Groundwater Elevations and Contours <br /> Prior to purging and sampling, each well was sounded for water depth using a weighted <br /> electronic sounder, and the static water level was recorded on a well data sheet <br /> (Appendix C). The groundwater elevations were calculated for each well by subtracting <br /> c:\zoii-ooso\FA_4QILdoc 8 Geo-Logic Associates <br />