My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_3
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:43 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:57:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2013_3
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2013_3.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
748
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Final Construction Quality Assurance Report— WMU FU -13 <br />Forward Landfill <br />Hydraulic Conductivity: Nine in situ soil samples were collected during placement and • <br />compaction of the low permeable clay liner soils and tested for permeability in GLA's Grass <br />Valley laboratory. Falling head, rising tail water tests were performed in the laboratory <br />according to the procedures outlined in ASTM D-5084. The permeability of the samples met <br />the specified value of 3.1 x10-8 cm/s or lower. Results of the laboratory permeability tests of <br />the low permeable clay liner are presented in Appendix D. Table 4 presents a summary of the <br />clay liner permeability tests. It should be noted that remolded permeability tests were <br />conducted on the clay borrow soils prior to clay liner construction in the field. Based on the <br />results of this testing, the compaction effort in the field was increased resulting in passing test <br />results. <br />When placement of the low permeable clay liner soils reached the required thickness and <br />elevations, the surface of the compacted clay liner was fine graded by a CAT 140H blade w/GPS <br />and finished with several passes by a vibratory smooth drum roller. GLA's CCW Monitor <br />observed the smooth drum rolling procedure and made recommendations to the Contractor <br />regarding rough areas where ridges or depressions were present; these areas were reworked <br />by the smooth drum roller until a smooth, even surface condition was evident. The surface of <br />the compacted clay liner was also monitored for potential desiccation cracking; any suspect • <br />areas were lightly moisture conditioned and reworked by the smooth drum roller. When the <br />clay liner surface preparation was complete, the area was re -inspected by GLA's CCW Monitor <br />and the liner installer; if acceptable, the area was approved for geomembrane placement. <br />Subgrade Acceptance forms for the area to be covered by geosynthetics were filled out and <br />exchanged between GLA's CQA Monitor and the installer. The Subgrade Acceptance forms are <br />presented in Appendix E. <br />Survey verification of all lines and grades was performed by RIA & Associates and reviewed by <br />GLA's CQA Officer prior to geosynthetics deployment. <br />4.4 EARTH FILL SOILS <br />Earth Fill soils were used to construct the temporary south and east termination berms on the <br />floor of FU -13. GLA's CQA Monitor observed construction of the temporary termination berms <br />including placement of "thin" (less than 12 -inch loose lifts) by the scrapers, scrapers splitting <br />their tracks, and additional moisture conditioning added as needed. CCW noted that the soils <br />compacted for the berms were firm and unyielding. Finish grading of the berms was <br />accomplished by the D6 CAT dozer and trimmed to finish grade dimensions by the D6 CAT dozer <br />with slope wings. • <br />10 <br />14 Geo -Logic <br />ASS 0C I A T E SJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.