Laserfiche WebLink
Water Quality Monitoring Report <br /> Forward Landfill <br /> Table 2-1 summarizes site monitoring parameters, analytical methods, and monitoring <br /> frequency. Water quality samples were also analyzed in the field for oxygen reduction <br /> potential (ORP), turbidity, temperature, specific conductance, and pH and recorded on <br /> well data sheets. The groundwater monitoring wells and leachate monitoring points <br /> were sampled in accordance with the sampling and analysis plan detailed in Appendix E. <br /> The well data sheets, raw laboratory data, certificates of analyses, and chain-of-custody <br /> records related to the sampling program are included in Appendix F. Field and <br /> laboratory analyses are summarized in Tables 2-2 through 2-6 and cumulative tabulated <br /> data for all monitoring points and constituents for groundwater, unsaturated zone, <br /> leachate, and surface water are presented in Appendix F. <br /> 2.1.2 QA/QC Results <br /> The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program completed for the third quarter <br /> 2014 water quality monitoring event included analyses of two trip blanks, one field <br /> blank, laboratory method blanks, and one duplicate sample (MW-17). The trip and field <br /> blanks were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and method blanks were analyzed <br /> for all of the analytes included in the monitoring program. The results of the QA/QC <br /> program indicate that no VOCs were detected in field, trip, or method blanks. Inorganic <br /> constituents including chloride, sulfate, magnesium, and potassium were measured at <br /> trace concentrations in method blanks analyzed with groundwater samples. However, <br /> at these very low concentrations, these constituents did not affect the interpretation of <br /> primary sample results. The results of the duplicate sample collected from well MW-17 <br /> yielded good correlation with a relative percent difference (RPD) of eight percent or <br /> less. The only exception was potassium with a RPD of 24 percent. Review of the <br /> sampling dates and laboratory analytical certificates indicates that all laboratory <br /> analyses were completed within required holding times. Based on the results of the <br /> laboratory QA/QC analyses, it is concluded that the laboratory data generated for the <br /> third quarter 2014 monitoring period are acceptable and the water quality samples <br /> collected from the Forward Unit appear to be representative of water quality at the site. <br /> 2.1.3 Groundwater Elevations and Contours <br /> Prior to purging and sampling, each well was sounded for water depth using a weighted <br /> electronic sounder to an accuracy of 0.01 foot, and the static water level was recorded <br /> on a Well Data Sheet (Appendix F). The groundwater elevations were calculated for <br /> each well by subtracting the depth-to-water measurement from the top-of-casing <br /> reference elevation. The current groundwater elevation data for the Forward Unit is <br /> summarized in Table 2-3. <br /> The groundwater elevation data obtained on August 25, 2014, were used to generate <br /> the groundwater elevation contour map shown on Figure 2-1 for the third quarter 2014 <br /> monitoring period, which indicates that groundwater beneath the eastern and <br /> southeastern portions of the Forward Unit flows to the northwest at a hydraulic <br /> M:\2014.0012\FA_3Q14.docx 5 <br /> 10/31/2014,Rev.0 <br />