Laserfiche WebLink
Water Quality Monitoring Report <br /> Forward Landfill <br /> ® Table 2-1 summarizes site monitoring parameters, analytical methods, and monitoring <br /> frequency. Water quality samples were also analyzed in the field for oxygen reduction <br /> potential (ORP), turbidity, temperature, specific conductance, and pH and recorded on <br /> well data sheets. The groundwater monitoring wells and leachate monitoring points <br /> were sampled in accordance with the sampling and analysis plan detailed in Appendix D. <br /> The well data sheets, raw laboratory data, certificates of analyses, and chain-of-custody <br /> records related to the sampling program are included in Appendix E. Field and <br /> laboratory analyses are summarized in Tables 2-2 through 2-7 and cumulative tabulated <br /> data for all monitoring points and constituents for groundwater, unsaturated zone, <br /> leachate, and surface water are presented in Appendix E. <br /> 2.1.2 QA/QC Results <br /> The quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) program completed for the first quarter <br /> 2015 water quality monitoring event included analyses of laboratory method blanks, <br /> and one duplicate sample (MW-14). The method blanks were analyzed for all of the <br /> analytes included in the monitoring program. The results of the QA/QC program <br /> indicate that no VOCs were detected in the method blanks. Inorganic constituents <br /> including calcium, magnesium, and sodium were measured at trace concentrations in <br /> method blanks analyzed with groundwater samples. However, at these very low <br /> concentrations, these constituents did not affect the interpretation of primary sample <br /> ® results. The results of the duplicate sample collected from well MW-14 yielded good <br /> correlation with a relative percent difference (RPD) of seven percent or less for <br /> quantifiable results. Review of the sampling dates and laboratory analytical certificates <br /> indicates that all laboratory analyses were completed within required holding times. <br /> Based on the results of the laboratory QA/QC analyses, it is concluded that the <br /> laboratory data generated for the first quarter 2015 monitoring period are acceptable <br /> and the water quality samples collected from the Forward Unit appear to be <br /> representative of water quality at the site. <br /> 2.1.3 Groundwater Elevations and Contours <br /> Prior to purging and sampling, each well was sounded for water depth using a weighted <br /> electronic sounder to an accuracy of 0.01 foot, and the static water level was recorded <br /> on a Well Data Sheet (Appendix E). The groundwater elevations were calculated for <br /> each well by subtracting the depth-to-water measurement from the top-of-casing <br /> reference elevation. The current groundwater elevation data for the Forward Unit is <br /> summarized in Table 2-3. <br /> The groundwater elevation data obtained on February 23, 2015, were used to generate <br /> the groundwater elevation contour map shown on Figure 2-1 for the first quarter 2015 <br /> monitoring period, which indicates that groundwater beneath the eastern and <br /> southeastern portions of the Forward Unit flows to the northwest at a hydraulic <br /> gradient of 0.002 ft/ft; groundwater beneath the southwestern and central portions of <br /> M:\2015.0014\FA 1Q15.docx 5 <br /> 4/27/2015,Rev.0 <br />