Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />Water Quality Monitoring Report <br />Forward Landfill <br />Non -Statistical Data Analysis <br />During the fourth quarter 2016 monitoring period, the CNSDAM was performed for VOCs <br />detected in the DMP wells. As shown in Table 3-1, excluding suspected lab contaminants, non - <br />statistical indications of a release were identified at well AMW-6 as a result of a quantifiable <br />concentration of tetrachloroethene (PCE) and a trace -level concentration of <br />dichlorodifluoromethane (DCDFM). For well AMW-12, trace concentrations of methyl ethyl <br />ketone (MEK) and PCE were also detected. At well AMW-12, PCE was previously reported to <br />the RWQCB and confirmed in retest samples. It should be noted that the PCE concentrations <br />measured at well AMW-12 remain well below state and/or federal maximum contaminant <br />levels (MCLs), and is being evaluated quarterly for temporal trends (Section 2.1.4). Forward <br />had previously requested that well AMW-6 be reclassified as a CAP well, since similar <br />concentrations have been historically measured in this well. <br />Concentration Limit Thresholds <br />In accordance with RWQCB Order No. 115-2014-0006, the routine inorganic monitoring data <br />obtained from the Austin Unit DMP wells during the fourth quarter 2016 monitoring period <br />were compared to intrawell concentration limits (CLs) established for each well. Details on the <br />statistical analysis for the established CLs are presented in Appendix G of the fourth quarter <br />2014 Water Quality Monitoring Report for the Forward Landfill (GLA, 2014). As summarized in <br />Table 3-3, the following CLs were exceeded during the fourth quarter 2016 monitoring period. <br />AMW-6 — bicarbonate <br />AMW-12 — nitrate -N <br />Retesting will not be performed for well AMW-6 since this well is interpreted to be a CAP well, <br />mis-identified in the most recent WDR. In a letter dated January 19, 2017, the RWQCB was <br />notified of the CL exceedance of nitrate -N in well AMW-12 and retesting is scheduled for <br />January 2017. <br />3.1.5 Corrective Action/Evaluation Program <br />Field and laboratory results for CAP and EMP wells for the fourth quarter 2016 monitoring <br />period are summarized in Table 3-2. Excluding suspected laboratory contaminants, 17 of 28 <br />CAP/EMP wells reported one or more VOCs exceeding a Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL), with <br />CAP well AMW-1 having the greatest number of VOCs (12) including 11 measured above a PQL. <br />An annual report discussing the CAP and EMP monitoring results for the Austin Unit was <br />prepared by Geo -Logic Associates (GLA, 2016) and is included in Appendix H. <br />3.1.6 Cannery Waste Land Application Monitoring <br />Field and laboratory results for CWLAM wells for the fourth quarter 2016 monitoring period are <br />summarized in Table 3-4 and were compared to Water Quality Protection Standards (WQPS) <br />Project No. 2016.0007 1 Water Quality Monitoring Report 12 <br />January 2017 <br />