Laserfiche WebLink
C7 <br />SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br />On June 30, 2017, a representative of Geo -Logic Associates (GLA) visited the property at the address <br />identified above and received permission from the resident to participate in the domestic well sampling <br />program. The well also services the adjacent tenant residence 7253 Newcastle Road. After receiving <br />permission, a groundwater sample was collected from sample port next to the well. A second sample <br />was collected from this location on July 13, 2017 (the purpose of the second sample was to confirm the <br />laboratory results from the June sample). The well access sheet, well inspection sheet, well sampling <br />data sheets, and laboratory reports for both sets of samples are attached. <br />Approximately 70 gallons of water was discharged from the sample point prior to collecting each <br />groundwater sample. Before collecting the sample, the temperature, pH, and the conductivity of the <br />groundwater were measured and recorded on the well sampling data sheet that precedes the <br />laboratory results. After these parameters were measured, a sample was collected for laboratory <br />analysis to identify whether volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may be present in the groundwater. The <br />groundwater sample was collected in laboratory -supplied sample containers, filled completely, <br />immediately capped, labeled, and placed in an ice -filled cooler. A completed chain -of -custody form <br />identifying the sample identification, date and time collected, and the analyses to be performed <br />accompanied the sample to BC Laboratories, a state of California certified laboratory located in <br />Bakersfield, California. The analyses performed by BC Laboratories included VOCs by EPA Method <br />8260B. The July 13, 2017 sample was also analyzed for nitrate/nitrite (as nitrogen) by EPA Method <br />353.2. <br />The laboratory reports attached to this letter show three values for each chemical compound that was <br />analyzed: the method detection limit (MDL), the practical quantitation limit (PQL), and the result of the <br />analysis. The MDL is the lowest concentration the laboratory can measure and the PQL is the lowest <br />concentration that can be accurately quantified. A laboratory result of ND means the VOC was not <br />detected at a concentration equal or greater than the MDL. A laboratory result followed by the letter <br />"1" is a "trace" concentration that falls between the MDL and PQL. This value is an estimate. A reported <br />result greater than the PQL is not qualified with a "1" and is an accurate value. <br />The laboratory reports also include the results of internal laboratory quality control tests that are <br />performed to verify the laboratory instruments are operating within the tolerances required by the <br />analytical method and that the sample(s) being tested are not affected by laboratory contamination. <br />Review of the quality control test results for the samples collected from your well in June and July 2017 <br />shows that the laboratory equipment was operating within its specified tolerances and that the samples <br />were not affected by laboratory contamination. <br />RESULTS <br />As shown on the attached laboratory reports and summarized in the following table, four VOCs were <br />detected in the groundwater sample collected on June 30, 2017. Tetrachloroethene (PCE) and <br />trichloroethene (TCE) were measured at quantifiable concentrations of 0.97 and 3.3 micrograms per <br />liter (µg/L), respectively, and estimated trace concentrations of chloroform and trichlorofluoromethane <br />(TCFM) were also detected in the primary sample. In response to the detection of these VOCs, a <br />40 confirmation sample was collected from the well on July 13, 2017. The trace concentrations chloroform <br />and TCFM were not detected in the confirmation sample; however, PCE and TCE were confirmed. A <br />M:\SO17.1030\7255 Newcastle.dou 2 <br />